Jump to content
SAU Community

MAP / fuel pressure typical delay times


Recommended Posts

Hello my tuning friends 

Just wanted to bounce some thoughts around here. What would you consider a normal time for fuel pressure to catch up to boost pressure?

Say your cruising at 4000 rpm at around 10% throttle, then you pin the throttle, how far behind the MAP pressure would you expect the fuel pressure to trail / how long would you expect it to take for the fuel pressure to catch up? Would you expect it to be linear, say the fuel pressure trails perfectly behind MAP by 2 psi and then when boost stabilises at the max setting, fuel pressure also stabilises?  

Reason I ask, very recently the fun police inside my ECU said no no to this happening (see attached picture) 

I've got the sad's looking at the data. Looks like my fuel pump isn't keeping up :(. Will have to think about long term solutions...

The silver lining is, the car drives fine. If you didn't look at any data you wouldn't know anything is wrong. 

FP lagging.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I installed this pump just over a year ago -

https://aeroflowperformance.com/af49-1057-525lph-e85-hi-flow-fuel-pump

Do we think the pump is starting to fail, or should I be looking at anything else in the fuel system?

When it was originally installed, everything was fine. I checked the 98 and e85 tunes, all good. 

For quite a while now, maybe 8+ months I've been on 98 only and the pump has been keeping up. But now that I've put e85 in it (the tank is currently about 50% ethanol) the pump suddenly can't keep up. No idea what's changed in the past year to upset the pump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

I installed this pump just over a year ago -

https://aeroflowperformance.com/af49-1057-525lph-e85-hi-flow-fuel-pump

Do we think the pump is starting to fail, or should I be looking at anything else in the fuel system?

When it was originally installed, everything was fine. I checked the 98 and e85 tunes, all good. 

For quite a while now, maybe 8+ months I've been on 98 only and the pump has been keeping up. But now that I've put e85 in it (the tank is currently about 50% ethanol) the pump suddenly can't keep up. No idea what's changed in the past year to upset the pump. 

I would not recommend using any of the aeroflow pumps. Very prone to failure.

*I use and recommend a lot of their products. Fuel pumps are still best to stay with the big player's TI, Bosch, Pierburg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

It's the same age, just over a year old. I'd be surprised if it was an issue.

It's less about the sock and more about what might have been shaken loose from the tank walls/floor maybe by E85 or summat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It's less about the sock and more about what might have been shaken loose from the tank walls/floor maybe by E85 or summat.

Yep a thing for sure, in this case though I've been on e85 for many years. Maybe 6 or 7 years? Can't remember, but a long time now.

But yeah, looks like I'm going to have to swap out the pump for the 3rd time now, so we'll get to see what the sock looks like anyways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

lol they are sexy. 

My imaginary car would run a big boy electric fuel pump though. Maybe 2 of something like these in tank - 

https://fuelab.com/91901-1000hp-in-tank-power-module-fuel-pump/p327

But knowing my luck, I'd find out fuel lab can't make pumps and I'd be pulling them out again anyway lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I haven't logged any data yet, but I wanted to bounce this off everyone while I'm waiting to take the car out for a proper run. 

So the car was very hard to start this morning, finally fired and I took it to Supercheap to test the battery. Turns out the battery was low on voltage (can't remember the exact figure) and down about 250cca from where it should have been. Even though their simple battery tester said the battery was "fine, just needs a charge" they replaced it under warranty, pretty happy with that. 

Could a failing battery be the cause of the pump failing to keep up? The pump is pretty hungry, it pulls something like 20 amps from memory but I don't know how much this all matters when the car is actually up and running and the alternator is doing its thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Could a failing battery be the cause of the pump failing to keep up?

Yeah, but maybe not. Maybe yeah. Maybe not. You know how it is. I mean, if the volts are low and the pump has reduced capacity, then it will maybe not be able to supply enough fuel to keep up with your peak demand, but it really shouldn't make it go lean as you're ramping up, then catch up again. The pump dynamics are (should be) a pretty instant trade off between flow rate and pressure, and even that shouldn't matter because it is actually the job of the fuel pressure regulator to take care of that dynamic, leaving the pump to see pretty much the same pressure and flow conditions any time the engine is running.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Could a failing battery be the cause of the pump failing to keep up?

Maybe go log your voltage vs. RPM as you doodling around town. The issue could be your alternator is cactus which has been supplying fluctuating voltage to the rest of your car thus killing your pump early.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Maybe go log your voltage vs. RPM as you doodling around town. The issue could be your alternator is cactus which has been supplying fluctuating voltage to the rest of your car thus killing your pump early.

Should I be logging ecu voltage or battery?

Edited by Murray_Calavera
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...