Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On my way to work this morning I heard on the radio that police are now going to be performing more random car stops to defect vehicles. They say its to crack down on "un-roadworthy" vehicles. So where does that leave us, Our vehicles are no where near un-roadworthy most of the time yet police continue to defect imported cars for the most silly things. I found this very annoying, just wanted to know the thoughts you guys have????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173389-defects-on-the-rise/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well fingers crossed they do actually aim at the unroadworthy cars.

Those that are rude as shit and force me to hit the recirc button as their car smokes and stinks like crap; those that run bald tyres, those that have noticable wheel bearing noise, those that have their rear pads metal on metal!!!! :(

Bring in the yearly inspections; similiar to that of otherstates.. Then we can have our local mechanic ensure our cars are up to scratch and also remove defects. At least I think thats how it works interstate?!? :worship:

Agree slightly . Like sambo said though , dont are cars need to be stock to pass an inspection. All this would mean that any of us with mods would be paying for our mechanic's next cruise in europe. LOL .Already done that. LOL.

What they should be targeting is those heap of s%#t cars that are over 25yrs old and full of rust etc .

Imagine having to pull of your exhaust , tint , pfc , rims , air filters etc every year. the bills would be scary $$$.

my ten cents anyway.

Those that are rude as shit and force me to hit the recirc button as their car smokes and stinks like crap; those that run bald tyres, those that have noticable wheel bearing noise, those that have their rear pads metal on metal!!!! :blink:

+1

or spend more time catching the thieves that steal cars

just out of curiosity; Im sure many of you have copped a canary on the windscreen of your Skyline. Including myself.

At one stage, i had 3 fkn stickers on the windscreen at once...

My question IS: What were you originally defected for when pulled over / vehicle randomly inspected? Too Loud? Too Low? Bald Tyres?

The open to atmosphere Blitz Blow off Valve was my serial offender/perpetrator!

Oh, and once bald tyres...

It wasnt until i had to go Regency park where they went over the whole bloody car that they wrote me a nice list of things that needed to be fixed/had to be reverted to stock. (this almost 7 years ago- back in 2000 -we live & learn eh!)...

(All my aftermarket goodies are back on there now however :domokun: )

You could take one look at my 33, and most people would pass it for bog stock; except the diameter of the rear muffler & its tip and the engine note when you hear it drive past. Have tried to keep it as sleepish as possible over the years i've owned it, and the last defect i received was the one for bald tyres in 2001.

i must add though.... i have never copped a random vehicle inspection... all of my defects were obatined due to scallywag behaviour! Being young and stupid behind the wheel was probably a large contributor.

So, what was it that the chops didnt like about your car that made em originally slap ya with a canary???

post-16018-1182306245.jpg

Kralster,

So that you know what we are talking about..........

When we say roadworthy we mean maintained to ensure it drives safely. That being good tyres, good shockers, good bushes, good brakes and doesn't leak oil/water.

Modified for performance; well that has nothing to do with not being roadworthy but everything to do with emissions.

---------

On the note of being defected.... I've been close. I was pulled over for Tint (30% on the front windows) and ripped it off on the spot.

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

i looked at this in the paper and almost considered selling my car

i doubt they'll take any of the shit boxes off the road to be honest. it'll just end up us all being picked on for having a safer car than factory

my car wasnt driveable when DA was on at mallala. Took my mum's stock standard 95 model toyota corolla for a cruise out there. Tell ya what, i felt safer in my car in the times ive been out on the drive to mallala previously than i did that one weekend in mum's car. My car gives you road feeling. Doesnt wander around in the grooves, just sits and behaves. Found the corolla wandering all over the road. Yes i know its a smaller car etc, but still arent some of the modifications we do a lot safer than standard?

i know this isnt really the issue, but its crap really. i heard that regency fees have gone up 200 percent too

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

having a few less kw doesnt mean it will be running cleaner than a high hp/kw car. Most cars here running big numbers would be actually running better than std with ideal afr numbers putting out less emissions than std. Even std cars with cat converters are useless as they are the same as a muffler that needs changing every few thousand kms to cut the emissions properly.

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

bah.... So its worse having a well maintained safe car that brakes well, is able to steer easily around obstacles, doesn't leak oil for you to hit on your catless motor bike that makes a little more power than an old dunga that has no suspension, leaks oil, bald tyres, no brakes etc etc....

You've completely missed the point.... There's so so many damn examples like this on the road and the police simply choose a modified car rather than one that is not maintained.

I'm so so sick of driving behind cars that blow smoke and stink. They need to do something about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...