Jump to content
SAU Community

Avgas

Jetdat

By Jetdat,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

2rismo Grand Master

2rismo

Posted
Posted
Obviously their not the same but are the same octane rating. He doesn't run avgas in it at the moment so there is no need to run it and their not really completely separate animals.

They might be the same octane rating but they don't share the same octane numbers. Apart from different burn rates, and the fact that Avgas contains TEL, the differences are vast. I again refer to MoTeC's testing on an engine dyno which suggests that V-Power Racing performed better than Avgas in every situation. The fact that the engine used was a 4G63 from an EVO IX only strengthens the argument that what they found applies to Skyline motors.

They ARE completely different products.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3189555
Share on other sites
Rowdyr32 Mentor

Rowdyr32

Posted
Posted

2rismo after all this you are confirming what I said in the first place. I'm in this for a discussion/learn.

The mixture known as gasoline, when used in high compression internal combustion engines, has a tendency to ignite early (pre-ignition or detonation) causing a damaging "engine knocking" (also called "pinging" or "pinking") noise. The discovery that lead additives modified this behavior led to the widespread adoption of the practice in the 1920s and therefore more powerful higher compression engines. The most popular additive was tetra-ethyl lead.

Lead is also a good lubricant for valves which prolongs engine life and the avgas around now is 100ll which is low lead with anti knock additives added.

Avgas also burns slower due to if having to stay as a liquid at high altitudes.

I couldn't find their BTU ratings though.

This might have a little to do with it.

It might seem odd that fuels with higher octane ratings explode less easily, yet are popularly thought of as more powerful. The misunderstanding is caused by confusing the ability of the fuel to resist compression detonation as opposed to the ability of the fuel to burn (combustion). However, premium grades of petrol often contain more energy per litre due to the composition of the fuel as well as increased octane.

What is the go with the octane rating vs octane number I don't know.

Marine diesel or Jet A-1 could be better :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3189670
Share on other sites
Omurru Veteran

Omurru

Posted
Posted
thats what i thought too that one tankful wouldnt hurt..

anymore info on toulene mix.. where to buy, how much to mix, how much cost and how much does it boost the octane??

might do some search on toulene..

There's a thread in the performance section I think called "backyard race fuel" I got the link somewhere if you can't find it, but losta interesting stuff in it.

AVgas will also melt your CAT causing it to block up. Yes...in one tank. Much like leaded(super) petrol would do if you ran it.

lol...cat... :(

Marine diesel or Jet A-1 could be better :)

lol, have fun running diesel in a petrol engine and A1 is Kero so have fun running that too :) A1 does smell good though..... :P

I think half the joy of running avgas is the smell :( I'd never put it in my skyline but a friend usees it in his SS all the time :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3189759
Share on other sites
Rowdyr32 Mentor

Rowdyr32

Posted
Posted

I found this in Wikipedia as well.

It is possible for a fuel to have a RON greater than 100, because isooctane is not the most knock-resistant substance available. Racing fuels, straight ethanol, AvGas and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) typically have octane ratings of 110 or significantly higher - ethanol's RON is 129 (MON 102, AKI 116). Typical "octane booster" additives include tetra-ethyl lead and toluene. Tetra-ethyl lead is easily decomposed to its component radicals, which react with the radicals from the fuel and oxygen that would start the combustion, thereby delaying ignition. This is why leaded gasoline has a higher octane rating than unleaded.

Don't hang me on the BTU rating but:

You stated that Avgas made less power why is this? I need facts.

As for Toluene I found it has a octane rating of 114. I have 20 litres at work and I know Snowy was put it in his car a while ago. Its commonly used as a knock deterent as far as I know.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3189815
Share on other sites
Jetdat Veteran

Jetdat

Posted
  • Author
Posted

my only reason for wanting to run higher octane was to reduce any chance of pinging...

i rarely have spirited runs let alone many runs in a row all day like in a drag day situation. so although i trust Benno's tune it still is unknown how the engine might behave on the track simply because its never been on one..

power increase was never my intention although i must admit R31Nismoids reply did make me think about fattening the power curve with better fuel..

but after reading the discussion and some good points made i decided to run on v-racing and see how it goes.. definately learned few things from this thread.. thanks for the replies...

thanks also for the links which i will be checking out...

edit: http://www.motec.com.au/fueltest/index.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3190142
Share on other sites
Jetdat Veteran

Jetdat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
There's a thread in the performance section I think called "backyard race fuel" I got the link somewhere if you can't find it, but losta interesting stuff in it.

yeah i found it last night and read thru most of it, was good reading..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3190259
Share on other sites
Jetdat Veteran

Jetdat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Octane isn't the only measure of a fuel when you're after some protection for a track day. Some of the very high octane unleaded fuels will burn very rapidly compared to pump fuel and could result in a lean AFR. Motec's website has some very interesting fuel test data comparing avgas and v-power racing from shell.

had a look at the motec site, very interesting indeed..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3190264
Share on other sites
Jetdat Veteran

Jetdat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Jetdat

If benno has set your tune with V power racing then don't touch it and race it with that fuel in the tank.

It will be fine.

I ran my car around sandown with his tune on vpower racing and the knock levels were fine all day.

Your engine has been tuned with the fuel characteristics of v power racing, don't go putting a higher octane rating fuel (even if it is unleaded) as this fuel will exhibit different burn characteristics etc

point taken archie01.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3190265
Share on other sites
Bass Junky Grand Master

Bass Junky

Posted
Posted

Jetdat.

If Benno tuned your car in V-Power Racing, DON'T use anything other than V-Power Racing.

You wont need to change anything. It's not like you are blazing away for 10-15 minutes on full boost, you are only blazing for maybe 10-15 seconds :O

If you are really worried, I can add some fuel to your tune temporarily on the weekend. It's not a permanent setting, it's a very basic add of fuel.

But, yeah, if Benno tuned it, it will be fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173443-avgas/page/2/#findComment-3191570
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...