Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, im just wondering as the title says if i can run my car on normal unleaded. I have heard a lot about increased risk of detonation and things, and a lot of people tell me better safe than sorry. but im still at school and im struggling to afford to fill her up, so how necessary is it?

Sorry if this has been discussed before

Any experience with problems asociated with running stock cars on normal unleaded would be appreciated, my car is a r33 gts25t completely stock

cheers

Jeremy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173614-can-i-use-91-ron-in-a-stock-r33/
Share on other sites

Generally, the higher the octane level, the lower the chance of detonation. Detonation damages your engine internals. Your car WILL run on 91 octane, but it's not smart to do so. If you HAVE to run the car on 91, then keep it below 5000rpm and lay off the boost.

The difference is only 10c per litre... Thats only like $6-7 per tank... Buy "home brand" bread and milk instead and give your car some decent juice man :D

The quality of fuel in Japan is higher than here too. Australian premium fuel is pretty much comparable to standard fuel in Japan from what i understand. That means that our standard fuel is definitely not sufficient to run a 'performance' car built in Japan, and designed for Japanese fuel.

Hope this helps..

Hi...

I own a 1995 R33 GTSt.

I use 91 RON fuel....always have...with never an issue to speak of......

.......in my 1996 Briggs and Stratton mower.

Edited by superspit

Would it be alright to run 91 for weekdays and then fill up with 98 for the weekends? As in use the 91 for daily(no boosting) and 98 when you want to give it a trash? I would assume it'll be fine aslong as you keep it off boost.

Would it be alright to run 91 for weekdays and then fill up with 98 for the weekends? As in use the 91 for daily(no boosting) and 98 when you want to give it a trash? I would assume it'll be fine aslong as you keep it off boost.

Yes it would be alright. It would be totally fine to put inferior petrol in your car. Nothing bad will happen. There you go, is that the answer you were looking for?

*Disclaimer* I am not responsible for rebuilding your engine :closedeyes:

think of it this way, your saving money by going cheap on petrol and causing damage to your engine. As someone said your only saving about $6-7 per tank and when your engine dies you will have to shell out 50x more then you have saved so far on petrol on an engine rebuild.

Dont be stingey

Hi...

I use to own a 1992 S13 sr20det

I used 91 RON fuel....always did...with never an issue to speak of......

.......oh, except for when the motor detonated and up 'n stopped one evening...$$$$$$

Edited by superspit
Seeing that we're on the topic of what type of petrol to use, what would happen if we were to put diesel fuel into our cars? :O

Actually we're all using diesel (yes, all of us). You get about twice as much torque than unleaded. We didnt want to tell you cos we thought it would blow your mind.

Actually your car will knock even more because the octane level is reduced... The oil in the fuel would probably accumulate in the valves, and screw your cat converter. The engine would definitely overheat and crap itself eventually.

These engines aren't designed to run 91 octane fuel. It would probably cost you more $$$ in poor fuel economy than the added cost of getting 98 octane stuff in the first place.

If you shop at Coles, you can get the discount vouchers to buy Optimax. Woolies/Safeway, you can get Caltex Vortex 95 octane (worst case). Shell probably have a 95 as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...