Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey folks,

just added some HKS 272 step 2 cams to my previously-stock-cammed RB26.

Boost is now earlier and smoother (thank God) on the T04Z.

Question is, why did I need to remove a stack of fuel at idle and pretty

much everywhere below 3000RPM? I mean, it's still running of the same

AFMs, so why is the AFR so badly out?

@idle it was below 10.5 before I took out injector duration.

Is there some explanation that has a sound engineering standpoint behind it?

Thanks,

Saliya

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174744-stock-272-cams-massive-richness/
Share on other sites

There is more airflow through the engine due to the increased valve timing overlap- hence the ECU is doing what the AFM tells it to do and adds more fuel. Simple.

Hey,

what I don't understand is why that would make it richer. The AFMs are measuring all the

air that goes through, same as before... more air + corresponding more fuel == same AFR

(but it wasn't, it was richer!)

I'm thinking it has something to do with corrections for RPM... maybe... but I'd really

like a good explanation for why the same air flow has resulted in more fuel being added...

Regards,

Saliya

It'd have something to do with the way the ECU cross referrences the rev/load tables in your pre-cam tune with the TPS values it expects.

So the airflow has gone up (which the computer sees as extra load through the AFM), but the cylinder pressure hasn't gone up much, due to most of the air flowing straight out the 'zorst valves at low revs, so you get lots of unburned fuel.

Interesting, but unburnt fuel shows up as lean on an A/F meter. All i can think of is the high load/low rpm cells must be tuned rich before hand(not the rich really, as at 1000rpm the difference in ms between 14:1 and 10:1 is bugger all)These cells are probably rich to assist the accel pump "circuit" im helping the car during hill starts and low rpm takeoffs where you would normally access these cells. Now with the cams you are accessing these cells at idle. Were they different cells than it used to idle at? These can be tricky to tune, as you cant hold these cells on the dyno(you should here a car at 1200 rpm on the dyno, sounds like the car is going to fall apart.

Interesting, but unburnt fuel shows up as lean on an A/F meter. All i can think of is the high load/low rpm cells must be tuned rich before hand(not the rich really, as at 1000rpm the difference in ms between 14:1 and 10:1 is bugger all)These cells are probably rich to assist the accel pump "circuit" im helping the car during hill starts and low rpm takeoffs where you would normally access these cells. Now with the cams you are accessing these cells at idle. Were they different cells than it used to idle at? These can be tricky to tune, as you cant hold these cells on the dyno(you should here a car at 1200 rpm on the dyno, sounds like the car is going to fall apart.

Well, this might be it - I didn't observe idle cells before the cam change. To be honest,

I didn't expect cams to affect AFRs the way they have, but you're right - time-wise

my changes aren't that radical - percentage-wise, they are...

It's now idling basically at N02/P04 although it accesses cells in N01/P03 occasionally.

Anyone with stock cams/AFMs and a 3.5" or bigger exhaust care to post where

their car's idling? Is this a relevant question? :)

At this stage it's only low RPM and load that I've been investigating; so even

hill starts etc. are in different map areas.

Regards,

Saliya

I thought that it would have moved more than one cell down, they usually idle at cell 2-3, was it at operating temp when you checked the mixtures?Hill starts should still access the same points, except it will probably take a few more revs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • ok so if i wanted to go 18's i would go for 8's  in front 30+ or 32+ off set at front and the back 9 would be ok? what offset should i aim for.. then can i do some  hunting for wheel rim choices..    If i get this - will this fit all around: Size: 18 x 8.5 +37 - n what tyres size tyre should i get for front n back?  
    • Absolute f*cking nightmare. I had to take breaks constantly, and I was always pissed off when I got home. The line split in Italy on day 2 (we drove from the Netherlands), lol. Driving any narrow European town was... well, sh*t.   Appreciate it man. Here, I'll just drop a favourite from the load I took on Saturday.   I'll update here when things happen with the car, the thing is, with stock power and almost everything chassis-wise taken care of, there really are no problems. 268,000kms now and counting.  
    • Ah! I actually managed to snag a lightly used set.... that aren't so suitable for me right now. They don't work on a GTT without some cutting or creative heat moulding. I thought about reselling them myself cause I didn't want to murder them, but it looks like I'm probably going to attempt to murder them/melt them because I may as well. @GTSBoy @PranK can somebody close this thread?
    • Hey mate,  I have a set, one is slightly damaged but wont be noticable once installed.  Shoot me a message if your still after them 
    • I couldn't wait But, the black constant tension hose clamps were too thick and there wasn't enough clearance at the T/B and I couldn't get it to seat properly, so I had use a silver one there I also added some 3" silicone over the alloy bit that goes through to hole on the radiator support as it looked like it was sitting on the edge of the hole in the radiator support, I never noticed a rattle or anything, but there was a witness mark It is basicly done, and I can live with the silver hose clamp at the T/B, I will get a black clamp for the head vent though where it is attached to the bulkhead fitting  It never stops...LOL, only issue now with the shock tower brace is it slightly touches the under bonnet liner now, if I leave it it will either wear some paint off the brace where it touches, or damage the liner, so I removed the liner to see what I have to work with, with the liner removed I have about 20mm of clearance, but sadly the middle part of the underside of the bonnet is only dusted with paint and looks crap, so I cannot have that, but.... as I have a roll of Carbuilders premium under bonnet insulation in the garage laying around that is only 5.5mm thick (we were going to use it on the boys Patrol, but he crashed the front of it a few months and it was written off, hence why he now drives my old Honda Accord Euro), I'll use the OEM liner as a template and get the Carbuilders stuff fitted up to cover that dusted paint up
×
×
  • Create New...