Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

Hey Dude I have a R34 GTT tiptronic auto Hybrid fmic, full exhaust from turb back,Greedy ebc, Safc2,BOV, POD, and my car gets 300 km to a full 50 lt tank it sucks what is wrong ????????????????? :thumbsup:

Edited by YPLAY4
i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

its all in how u drive the car keep it off boost and u will do fine. i have a r32 gtst with fmic dump pipie full exhaust stock cat uped boost pod filter. and i get 450 to 500 normaly but when i give it some i get bout 300 to 350 and thats not even on empty.

GTT tank is 65L. If you used 48L to top up then you have approximately another 17L left. 280kms to 48L is still pretty rich. I just filled up my tank today with 47L after having done 360kms.

The usual culprits are O2 sensor, spark plugs, AFM...perhaps take it for a tune and service.

NISMO is right, the tank is about 65L. I'll normally get about 400kms region to a full tank. I don't run it till the lights come out though. Got a 3" turbo back, fmic, pod, ssqv, boost at 12psi, foot is a little heavy at times :nyaanyaa:. Really depends on how you drive.

changing the o2 sensor will help, changed mine and i went from 300km a tank to about 430km tank.

This sounds more like it. I have a s2 stagea (r34 engine, gearbox), which is quite a bit heavier than a skyine and on 48L my car will get over 400km around town. Its got 160awkw too so its not stock either.

My guess is that you should at least be getting more than 350km on this amount of fuel, modified or not. If its doing less than that, you need to either adjust your driving style or look for whats causing the problem - eg. check your O2 sensor. :D

A good free-flowing exhaust, SAFC or similar, and improved ignition timing will help your fuel economy as well, not to mention a bigger turbo (off boost while cruising). :D

As others have previously mentioned, the fuel capacity is 65L so try pumping it as much as possible. Reducing the use of boost should help acheive more k's. If not u better get it checked out.

my 2c worth

the following could be causing it too

Dirty air filter - causing the motor to work harder than it needs to , cause its not getting the airflow it needs

Slightly too thick oil - are you using the correct grade of oil in it ? I mistakingly used some stuff that was too thick in another car I had - and I did notice a drop in economy

change the o2 sensor as previously advised

have you ever had the car on a dyno? the dyno readout of AFR can definately tell you a LOT about what your motor is doing. I think if you were chasing the most kays per tank .. an after market ecu or a few add in mods like a SAFC and a SITC ( I think thats the one that controls engine timing )

if you got the above fitted . and spent some time and money on a dyno tune.. you would probably get more power and use less fuel. dont forget if a motor is running really really rich .. then its safe.. but .. its just pissing fuel out the tail pipe , leaning the mix to a leaner (yet still safe ) will yeild more power and less fuel consumption - but dont fall into the trap though of getting a bit more power and driving like a maniac - cause of course your goign to use more fuel

good luck matey!

if you can afford it run with a good fuel like BP ultimate 98 - just less chance of it pinging/detonating if you push it hard.

Oh and .. have a look around .. because you can find " equivalent " o2 sensors that are usually less expensive. To be honest I am not 100% certain if the equivalent o2 sensor will be " just as good" as a geniune one. But its worth a go.

Make sure you get some good crimp connectors to join it up , as my previous experience with this proved that the wires they use on o2 sensors are impossible to solder ( I think they are stainless? )

thanks everyone .now i think i catch the key point.

another question : which grade of petrol should the gtt fill? #98?

thanks everyone .now i think i catch the key point.

another question : which grade of petrol should the gtt fill? #98?

As this had been covered many many times, anything just 98 Octane will be just fine. Be it BP Ultimate, Caltex Vortex 98, Shell V-Power, V-power Racing, Mobil Synergy, they are all fine. Just a personal preference on which 'BRAND' one prefer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...