Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Roy,

I put my R on the scales at Wanneroo. With me in it & a full tank of juice the numbers were:

Front 906kg.

Rear 687 kg.

Total 1593kg.

So in perecentage terms it works out to be 57/43.

Now I weigh 100kg, a tank of petrol is about 50, so there is still a rather eye watering 1440kg of Nissan to lug around. I didn't do the corners one by one, however.

Ride height won't affect the static weight distribution, but it will affect the wheel loadings when the car pitches under brakes.

The usual GTR weight distributions quoted are 62% front and 38% rear, that's no driver and limited fuel. Corrected for that the above looks like;

-----------------------Fuel-------Driver

Front-------906---------------------20----------886---------61%

Rear-------687---------50----------80----------557---------39%

Total-------1593--------50---------100---------1443------- 100%

Pretty close.

:sleep: Cheers :)

The usual GTR weight distributions quoted are 62% front and 38% rear, that's no driver and limited fuel. Corrected for that the above looks like;

-----------------------Fuel-------Driver

Front-------906---------------------20----------886---------61%

Rear-------687---------50----------80----------557---------39%

Total-------1593--------50---------100---------1443------- 100%

Pretty close.

:sleep: Cheers :)

Um I think you got the weight distibution for the driver back to front - or atleast it should be closer to 50 - 50. Which makes it a bit worse than 61/39! This on top of the fact that I have had some work done to try & make things a little better.

  • 3 weeks later...
No problem, I have done quite a few conversions to coil overs for the Skyline guys who do a bit more circuit work and have the tyres to take advantage of the higher spring rates. Basically the conversion consists of;

2 x Front Main Springs

2 x Rear Main Springs

2 x Rear helper/tender springs

4 x Coil over conversion kits for the Bilsteins

You have 2 choices in springs, Eibach (the best) or Whiteline, pretty damn good, made in Europe, cold wound on a hydraulic coil winding machine.

The full conversion is $980 using Eibach springs and $790 using Whiteline springs, that includes delivery as usual.

The valving in the Group Buy R32GTR Bilsteins will handle up to 310 lbs/inch (5.5 kg/mm) on the front, which is around 40% more than what you currently have. The rear Bilsteins will handle up to 260 lbs/inch (4.5 kg/mm) which is around 25% more than what you currently have. The most common upgrade for the track day guys is 275/225 which works very well with the usual R type tyres (RE55, A048R, R888, D01 etc)

R33GTR Bilsteins will handle slightly more spring rate, R32/R33GTST and R34GTT slightly less.

The conversion is simple, most definitely DIY and should take less than 2 hours if you know your way around your car.

Delivery is pretty much overnight as I have most items in stock, Eibach occasionally run out of some spring rates though.

Obviously I can revalve the Group Buy Bilsteins if you are running a full slick that requires a higher spring rate.

PM me for more details.

:action-smiley-069: cheers :D

SK, I tried to PM you but your inbox is full (has been for some time). Email didn't work either.

Anyone have any suggestions as to how I can actually purchase this stuff?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...