Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys i have recently been having some stalling issues with my r33. it has t4 turbo, 720cc injectors, nitrided crank, and ssq vta bov, and 3inch exhaust, fmic.

after about 20min to 1hr of driving my air fuel guage fails to register, it only blips back to normal once and a while. if i take too long to change gears, or come to a quick stop, the dash lights come on, and the revs drop, almost stalling.

i will get it serviced and tuned in the coming weeks. i am also investing an an apexi safc, hopefully these things will help.

any advice would be helpfull.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177513-r33-stalling-issues/
Share on other sites

have u got a remap? cos stock ecu + 720cc injectors wont work to tell

has it always been stalling? when did the problem start? who did the last tune/remap?

have u tried ecu reset?

yeah, mate, i bought the car with most of the mods done, with a mines ecu chip, or so he said. it has all been running sweet till about 2months ago (had it for 7months). the last tune was 6months ago (edit-previous owner ) at supertune on the gold coast. there appears to be no mechanical issues like corroded pipes and stuff. i am just hoping it needs a re-tune. but i would like to know everyones opinion, maybe someone has had this problem.

Edited by r33cruiser

Take the bov off and replace it with a stock one, then see if the problem is fixed.

Take the AFR guage out and throw it in the bin. what do you mean it fails to register? no power, no signal?

Likely a dead O2 sensor. borrow one & see what happens. My O2 died recently - Idle hunts up & down all over the place once it's warmed up, and I'm assuming goes into closed-loop mixture control.

+1 for O2 sensor.

my gtr has a problem were both O2 sensors are reading 0.00. Car stalls and runs like crap. think mine has a problem in the wiring harness somewhere as both senors go down at the same time and it comes and goes.

if the o2 sensor is dead then that will cause it not to register on the guage.

thanks for all your replies, this still happens with the stock bov. and by not rregistering on the a'f ratio gauge, once this happens, the gauge doesnt light up any more.

i will borrow a mates o2 sensor and test the theory, thanks for all of your replies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...