Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I recently purchased a Greddy Type S bov, which is in fairly new condition. I'm just having problems with getting it to work on my Ford xr6 Turbo.

So i was seeing if theres any skyline people that have fitted one of these and live in melbourne.

Mine just flutters loudly for about 3 seconds when im driving and hear a slight high pitch *ting noise that is extremely quiet.

anyways, was hoping to see if there were any guys that can help me out, as guys on the ford forums obviously can't since those guys arent familiar with these products and they all stick to their turbo smart bovs.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177796-greddy-type-s-bov/
Share on other sites

I would look at the adjuster on top and wind it all the way in... maybe even upgrade the spring inside.

Your trying to vent a very large amount of air through the budget range trust bov designed for a much smaller engines.... you should be using the type r.

oo i see. hrm

my cars actually stock, and i've tried it on a heavily boosted xr6T and it sounded and reacted the same.

- I opened this bov y'day and it actually has 2 thing springs of the same length. one just sitting in the middle of the other one.

i have fiddled witht the aduster.

having it full in. and then to really soft

haivng the screw at mid-point. i can get it to go pssh but then it just has a long high pitch whistle thats really faint.

Im wanting to try and connect that smaller nipple to a hose as well which i read, makes the bov function quicker and louder. Do i have to make my own connection for it on my car? as my car only has one main vacuum hose.

the second nipple is usually used to control boost, similar to a wastegate but on the pressure side, i have used it to good effect on smaller cube engines... i doubt it could pass enough air effectively on a 4litre.

the second nipple is usually used to control boost, similar to a wastegate but on the pressure side, i have used it to good effect on smaller cube engines... i doubt it could pass enough air effectively on a 4litre.

ok. np .

Thanks for the advice.

i forgot to post my pictures up before hand.. here they are.

its not the best setup as its using the wrx adaptor. and being an ebay item, i did want to see if it actually worked before buying the correct adaptor which i'm ordering off ebay now.

I am still concerned as i put it on my mates '98 wrx and i didnt really hear that high pitch whistle at all as well.

anyways, ill see what happens when i hook it up to the appropriate adaptor. cheers

IMG_0181.jpg

bov-1.jpg

but the plumback attachment isn't connected to anything? So while you might not hear the loudsest *insert noise here* you should hear something. People with skylines have gotten something similar simply by disconnecting the plumback hose and blocking it off.

I have no idea how the WRX's are set up, but the way that is, would it be very responsive? If at all? Becuase you'd think that tiny little pipe that the BOV is connected to might even be a little restrictive?? I'm merely guessing here by the way. Andrew, if you've seen the setup on skylines you'll notice that the BOV's are directly attached to the intake pipes, not off a small seperate hose, don't know if that means anything or not.....

but the plumback attachment isn't connected to anything? So while you might not hear the loudsest *insert noise here* you should hear something. People with skylines have gotten something similar simply by disconnecting the plumback hose and blocking it off.

I have no idea how the WRX's are set up, but the way that is, would it be very responsive? If at all? Becuase you'd think that tiny little pipe that the BOV is connected to might even be a little restrictive?? I'm merely guessing here by the way. Andrew, if you've seen the setup on skylines you'll notice that the BOV's are directly attached to the intake pipes, not off a small seperate hose, don't know if that means anything or not.....

yep i understand the bov's are attatched off the intercooler pipes. I just wanted to actually see if this BOV was in working condition after buying off ebay. but this adaptor directely clamps into the i/c hosing.

I've actually found an adaptor on ebay after a long search. which will require me to cut up my rubber i/c hose and clamp this in. so i shall see what happens then.

hey mad082, all the clips i've seen off youtube that have people reving their engines and their greddy type s make the whistle, they don't actually have those trumpets? but i wouldn't mind putting one on it.

looks like i gotta do some more ebaying now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...