Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am getting an apexi s-afc II fitted (to my 33 gtst) and tuned on a dyno and i was wondering roughly what price would you guys expect to pay for the installation and the tuning since i already have the unit. I was quoted at around 250 for the install and another 200-250 for the tuning. Does that sound about right? 250 for the install sounds a bit high..... but then, i have no idea what is involved in fitting one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17877-question-about-apexi-s-afcii/
Share on other sites

Sounds way to dear to me, I fitted my own SAFC, got the wire diagram in English off the American Apexi site, and the tune cost $110. Ocasionally in VIC we have Skyline Dyno days where it can work out even cheaper, see if QLD boys do the same.

Getting my SAFC2 fitted in Bris next wk at Charlie's Motors. Very professional and comprehensive dynoing. Had my previous model fitted there last year and the guys specialise in Apexi gear and skylines. The guy who actually tunes the cars (Charlie's son) owns and races hos own 'line. Takes a good two to three hours to fit and tune right - all up, $250, max, guaranteed! And these guys really know what they're doing... Now, if only he can get rid of that flat spot b/w 4500 and 5500 rpm - finally - and get me those 25 rwkw everybody tells me the SAFC2 will net me!!! Fingers crossed! Located around the corner from the GABBA in the city! Book early though as there's usually a 2-3 wk wait!

Stay tuned!!! I hope this helps!

iijj

Originally posted by iijj

Now, if only he can get rid of that flat spot b/w 4500 and 5500 rpm - finally -  

I Have the same damn thing !! only started recently... according to a well known & respected Skyline tuner it's either:

1. Plugs (fouled, incorrect gap etc)

2. AFM (fouled, faulty)

He tells me that "narrow band" issues like this are nearly always due to one or both !!

Hope this adds, etc.

At most its probably 1 to 1.5 hours worth of work wiring it up and then locating it somewhere you want it. If you know what your doing get them to wire it up and then you can place it where you want and save some money. To tune it, I dont think it would take more than 1 hour on the dyno to tune. Most workshops in perth (that specialise in imports) charge around the $50/hr mark to labor and then around the $110 mark for dyno time. If you get the wiring diagram it probably isnt very hard to wire up at all, as thats all your doing when installing it.

will the SAFC2 remove the standard boost cut at 12 psi ?

Do you have to install a fuel cut defender as well?

Yes i have intercooler FM

Yes i have changed the turbo to Steel wheels.

I want 17 18 psi

What is the most power you can get from a S-AFC2 with standard fuel pump / injectors if they hold up ok?

Has anyone got a SAFC2 and good power figures?!?

What about SAFC (first version) does that remove boost cut too ?!?

guilt toy,

removes the 'fuel cut'. Boost cut is only present with the factory boost solenoid.

The S-afc has a +50% correction availible for more fuel and can accept Z32 AFM. So still able enough for a mild hi-flow turbo.

I have a S-afc 2, my power figures are good.

I wouldnt pay any more than 100 bucks to get the SAFC tuned, and 100 bucks installed. You should considering DIY installation. I did and Its not very hard, and u can pocket 100 bucks =)

THe tune would only take about 10 minutes. Very easy to map on the SAFC!

Originally posted by rev210

there is no such thing as 'boost cut', it's airflow sensed fuel cut. And yes it gets removed.

You don't want to run 13psi with a stock turbo either.

I have tuned my S-afc 2 without a dyno.

what about the first original s-afc ? the one with the dials. Do they do the same job ?

Do they remove the fuel cut too ???

REV210 I've read heaps of your stuff and it looks like you know your way around the underbonnet as much as behind the wheel.. How hard do you think it would be for a relative novice to fine-tune an SAFCII. I understand most of what it can adjust and have owned a VAFC previously so I know a little (more about the monitor mode than the setting mode but willing to learn).

Finally, should I reset my ECU b4 I put the SAFC2 on??? Just put 3" cat-back on last wk... and should I try to find and check/clean my AFM b4, or just see what the mech says???

iijj

Well i got it fitted and tuned today, was 210hp (12psi) before and 231hp (10psi) after. So its on 2psi less boost now and they had to adjust the timing back a bit due to the stock intercooler being pretty well shagged and also not getting much airflow because of the different front bar thats on it. So next stop, FMIC so it can be retuned to its full potential. 20hp gain on less boost&timing sounds alright for now.

On the seat of the pants meter i dont think it feels as good as it did before, but i can't be too sure. Doesnt feel like it pulls as hard as it used to.

iijj,

The reset won't do anything, do it if you like.

Tuning wise; I guess I put the 'graph mode' on and use rev's Vs knock. I take a refference on the log and look at the peak values on the other screen. Take away fuel, take away timing, add fuel add timing.

If the car is pretty stock the afr can be pegged back in the top end on high throttle and on low throttle in the low/mid range I've added a bit of fuel to improve throttle response.

$250 for installation is crazy! Its really not that hard to do, did mine in just over an hour with the wiring manual provided. I would say it should take some who knew what they were doing 1 – 1.5 hours which should only cost between 60 -90 dollars. Couldn’t see how it could cost $250 just for the install and then having to pay extra for tuning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...