Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all this is my situation.

I have a 96 r33 gtst and when driving and coming to a stop and sometimes whilst driving the car will stall.

Whilst sitting at the light after stopping the idle of the car sometimes sits at 1k or 1.2k or even sometimes

after i have started it again it idles at 2k. If i rev it it drops back to normal 700rpm. Im thinking it may be the AFM.

My car has the following mods: cat back exhaust, bov, boost controller, pod filter. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Price for a new airflow meter if that is the problem?

regards

jim

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179316-r33-gtst-staling-problem/
Share on other sites

so most probably it has a leak right? or if i can tighten it it will take more pressure to open up.

just a quick question how does the bov controll the idle and stalling. vaccum leaks i guess

No, it wont have a leak. Its just ATMO venting.

The AFM (near your pod) normally has the air re-circ back to it. The ECU expects it to be there and buy installing a pointless Atmo BOV, your sending the ECU into a fit.

To fix the problem for good you have two options.

1. Put the stock BOV back on (less than $100)

2. Purchase some management, pay for a tune (potentially over $1500)

BOV's are a pointless mod, much like pod filters. They offer not performance gain over the OEM gear, if anything they hinder performance

a bandaid fix for it is to get new spark plugs.

spark plugs?? i had the same problem the factory bov (when run in atmo)is held open a little by vaccum from the manifold which basically intoduces a leak into the intake system, the engine is taking in unmetered air, if it is adjustable just tighten it a little other wise vent it back and you shouldnt have a problem.

Edited by drf76
spark plugs?? i had the same problem the factory bov is held open a little by vaccum from the manifold which basically intoduces a leak into the intake system, the engine is taking in unmetered air, if it is adjustable just tighten it a little other wise vent it back and you shouldnt have a problem.

If it were a factory BOV you wouldn't have aproblem if it were open at idle for letting in unmetered air, as it'd just be allowing the same metered air to travel a different path INTO the engine.

If it were a factory BOV you wouldn't have aproblem if it were open at idle for letting in unmetered air, as it'd just be allowing the same metered air to travel a different path INTO the engine.

i always thought that it would cancel out due to the air being sucked into the turbo and air being blow out towards the throttle body pipe where the bov is mounted, taking of the bov recirc pipe stuffs the balance and causes air to be drawn in, its just like having a pcv valve connected with a catch tank that is vented, it would cause a vac leak through the rocker cover, thats why near the bov recirc pipe you have the breather for the rocker cover into the intake pipe (near the afmeter) to stop a vac leak to the manifold.

i always thought that it would cancel out due to the air being sucked into the turbo and air being blow out towards the throttle body pipe where the bov is mounted, taking of the bov recirc pipe stuffs the balance and causes air to be drawn in, its just like having a pcv valve connected with a catch tank that is vented, it would cause a vac leak through the rocker cover, thats why near the bov recirc pipe you have the breather for the rocker cover into the intake pipe (near the afmeter) to stop a vac leak to the manifold.

Turbo does nothing at idle.

Air comes in through AFM, through turbo, through throttle, into manifold.

If BOV is open

Air comes through AFM, through turbo (And also through the recirc pipe and comes out just before the throttle) and then into manifold.

Whilst the car is in vacuum. Air is being SUCKED not forced through the intake.

Turbo does nothing at idle.

Air comes in through AFM, through turbo, through throttle, into manifold.

If BOV is open

Air comes through AFM, through turbo (And also through the recirc pipe and comes out just before the throttle) and then into manifold.

Whilst the car is in vacuum. Air is being SUCKED not forced through the intake.

i know air is not forced into the intake lol wrong wording, its not on boost at idle, the suction before and after the turbo cancels out when you have the recircirc pipe connected so no air is being drawn through the bov, put it this way would it be good to have a small hole in the intercooler piping which is wat the bov is basically doing.

i know air is not forced into the intake lol wrong wording, its not on boost at idle, the suction before and after the turbo cancels out when you have the recircirc pipe connected so no air is being drawn through the bov, put it this way would it be good to have a small hole in the intercooler piping which is wat the bov is basically doing.

If there's a recirc ppipe, then that's like saying, with a hole in the intercooler piping, put an AFM so the ECU knows.

The air, even if the engine is pulling air through the BOV from the recirc pipe, the recirc pipe is still AFTER the AFM, therefore, it's affectively just "changing lanes" but it still went through the toll

If there's a recirc ppipe, then that's like saying, with a hole in the intercooler piping, put an AFM so the ECU knows.

no its only there on idle due to the high vacumm, so its sealed under boost, im just saying at idle low rpm with vacumm. Its too hard to explain, its exacltly the same a have a pcv valve with a vented catch tank almost the same thing. By the way Im basing this if the factory bov is run to the atmoshpere, i understand that if it run with a recirc pipe there is no difference it just taking a different path still to the throttle body, i think there was a misunderstanding MBS206

Edited by drf76
no its only there on idle due to the high vacumm, so its sealed under boost, im just saying at idle low rpm with vacumm. Its too hard to explain, its exacltly the same a have a pcv valve with a vented catch tank almost the same thing. By the way Im basing this if the factory bov is run to the atmoshpere, i understand that if it run with a recirc pipe there is no difference it just taking a different path still to the throttle body, i think there was a misunderstanding MBS206

If there's no recirc pipe, that's most likely one of the huge issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...