Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeh the one im talking about was the grey R32, 13.72 was the time beer baron, dont think it was on slicks when it did it and had a strange miss-fire halfway through second.

and i think slicks would make a differnce as to how quick you reach a certain speed, 0-300 is a timed event, slicks = less time wheel spinning, and more time on the power, means you get to that speed in less time. unless you want to get into maths/physics with rolling resistance at higher speed etc, i really cant see how it wouldnt make a difference

i know you like your drag racing, go run on a set of $30 retreads vs some real good tyres. 0-300 is basically the same format as drag racing, just with a different goal

I'm not getting into an argument over a record that's not even mine. I only posted it as a matter of interest.

I have the official times in an old HPI magazine, ill try find it.. ALso, I too agree that their is an advatage to Slicks vs. Steet Legal tyres. Was this new one running an Engine Under 3.0ltrs?

Edited by Gazzilla
  • 2 months later...

Hi Everyone

I just got sent this link and i thought i would post to clear a few things up.

The run was done on a set of Radial tyres,the same type tyre as the Nitto.

If anyone wants to have a go at this record,it cant be done on a prepped drag strip.

you also need to have propper timing gear fitted.

Keith

Hi Everyone

I just got sent this link and i thought i would post to clear a few things up.

The run was done on a set of Radial tyres,the same type tyre as the Nitto.

If anyone wants to have a go at this record,it cant be done on a prepped drag strip.

you also need to have propper timing gear fitted.

Keith

Congrats on the record mate, thats a seriously impressive time!!

Don't suppose you could give us some info on the engine setup?

Cheers

Congrats on the record mate, thats a seriously impressive time!!

Don't suppose you could give us some info on the engine setup?

Cheers

Hi PM-R33

Here is the spec of the engine.

3L OS Giken motor, uprated Tomei oil pump, RB Motorsport big sump and Trust remote oil filter kit, RB Motorsport modified

oil feed to cylinder head, Mocal oil cooler,RB Motorsport cylinder head Oil Scavenge Pump system,Turbo Dynamics 1250 bhp GT spec single turbo,Trust 60mm racing wastegate and short dump pipe, Trust RSPL-R 170mm-thick cored

intercooler, RB Motorsport custom hard pipe kit, Trust racing dump valve,R.B Motorsport 110mm throttle body, R.B Motorsport ultra-large plenum, HKS 300+ degree Step 3 PRO L camshafts, OS Giken 3L adjustable cam pulleys,Tomei kevlar-reinforced timing belt, Tomei valve springs and retainers, RB Motorsport-spec modified cylinder head with 1.5mm Oversize IN /EX valves,

Trust 1.2mm head gasket, RB Motorsport fuel rail, 1600cc injectors, New Bosch 044 external fuel pump system,uprated fuel pressure regulator,12-litre alloy fuel cell, Trust OS 3L exhaust manifold, Meercat modified 5" exhaust system, Trust uprated radiator,

RB Motorsport modified cylinder head cooling system, Autronic SM4 engine management unit, Autronic 500R High power Direct Fire ignition CDI unit 605 Volts, large Autronic boost solenoid, six Bosch single-plug coils Power Output expect 1200 true bhp.

We also run the car at 9000 revs with 3 bar boost.

3lengine.jpg

3l1engine.jpg

Edited by Team Cowie

thanks guys,I hope to have the incar vid soon

here is the data from the run

Below is the data pasted directly from the Datron file:

It shows:

Distance line every 1/4 mile (1320ft) and additionally at 60ft.

It also shows a Time line every 10mph and additionally at 100kmh (62.1mph).

0-30 mph - 1.226

0-60 mph - 2.539

0-100 mph - 4.346

0-150 mph - 8.085

0-200 mph - 14.751

0-187.31 12.474sec

300kmh is 186.4mph (exact times details of this to follow)

60ft 1.828, 46.03

1/4mile 9.364, 163.73

1/2mile 14.333, 197.78

Time File, C:\Data\playtime\Cowie-009T.csv

Report File, C:\Data\playtime\Cowie-009R.csv

Top Speed, 206.4 mph

Min Satellites, 9

Time(s), Speed( mph), Distance(ft), GPSTime, GPSDate, #sats

0.000, 0.00, 0.00, 14:18:19.002, 29/07/2007, 9

0.421, 10.00, 3.10, 14:18:19.422, 29/07/2007, 9

0.838, 20.00, 12.34, 14:18:19.840, 29/07/2007, 9

1.226, 30.00, 26.50, 14:18:20.228, 29/07/2007, 9

1.606, 40.00, 45.96, 14:18:20.608, 29/07/2007, 9

1.828, 46.03, 60.00, 14:18:20.830, 29/07/2007, 9

1.978, 50.00, 70.59, 14:18:20.979, 29/07/2007, 9

2.539, 60.00, 114.99, 14:18:21.541, 29/07/2007, 9

2.611, 62.14, 121.22, 14:18:21.613, 29/07/2007, 9

2.883, 70.00, 147.76, 14:18:21.885, 29/07/2007, 9

3.260, 80.00, 189.30, 14:18:22.262, 29/07/2007, 9

3.906, 90.00, 269.15, 14:18:22.907, 29/07/2007, 9

4.346, 100.00, 330.53, 14:18:23.348, 29/07/2007, 9

5.001, 110.00, 432.30, 14:18:24.003, 29/07/2007, 9

5.696, 120.00, 548.67, 14:18:24.698, 29/07/2007, 9

6.298, 130.00, 659.03, 14:18:25.300, 29/07/2007, 9

7.341, 140.00, 866.28, 14:18:26.343, 29/07/2007, 9

8.085, 150.00, 1024.58, 14:18:27.087, 29/07/2007, 9

8.924, 160.00, 1215.43, 14:18:27.925, 29/07/2007, 9

9.364, 163.73, 1320.00, 14:18:28.366, 29/07/2007, 9

10.377, 170.00, 1566.42, 14:18:29.379, 29/07/2007, 9

11.597, 180.00, 1879.83, 14:18:30.599, 29/07/2007, 9

13.010, 190.00, 2263.43, 14:18:32.011, 29/07/2007, 9

14.333, 197.78, 2640.00, 14:18:33.334, 29/07/2007, 9

14.751, 200.00, 2762.09, 14:18:33.753, 29/07/2007, 9

17.126, 200.00, 3470.83, 14:18:36.127, 29/07/2007, 9

17.818, 190.00, 3668.89, 14:18:36.820, 29/07/2007, 9

18.567, 180.00, 3872.14, 14:18:37.569, 29/07/2007, 9

18.904, 175.68, 3960.00, 14:18:37.906, 29/07/2007, 9

19.311, 170.00, 4063.22, 14:18:38.313, 29/07/2007, 9

20.009, 160.00, 4232.19, 14:18:39.011, 29/07/2007, 9

20.852, 150.00, 4423.65, 14:18:39.853, 29/07/2007, 9

21.696, 140.00, 4602.68, 14:18:40.698, 29/07/2007, 9

22.787, 130.00, 4819.60, 14:18:41.789, 29/07/2007, 9

Time(s), Speed( mph), Distance(ft), GPSTime, GPSDate, #sats

0.000, 0.00, 0.00, 14:18:19.002, 29/07/2007, 9

0.015, 0.48, 0.01, 14:18:19.017, 29/07/2007, 9

0.215, 5.04, 0.82, 14:18:19.217, 29/07/2007, 9

0.415, 9.87, 3.00, 14:18:19.417, 29/07/2007, 9

0.615, 14.68, 6.60, 14:18:19.617, 29/07/2007, 9

0.815, 19.43, 11.61, 14:18:19.817, 29/07/2007, 9

1.015, 24.41, 18.04, 14:18:20.017, 29/07/2007, 9

1.215, 29.71, 25.97, 14:18:20.217, 29/07/2007, 9

1.415, 34.89, 35.45, 14:18:20.417, 29/07/2007, 9

1.615, 40.24, 46.47, 14:18:20.617, 29/07/2007, 9

1.815, 45.68, 59.07, 14:18:20.817, 29/07/2007, 9

2.015, 51.00, 73.25, 14:18:21.017, 29/07/2007, 9

2.215, 51.86, 88.33, 14:18:21.217, 29/07/2007, 9

2.415, 56.30, 104.20, 14:18:21.417, 29/07/2007, 9

2.615, 62.26, 121.58, 14:18:21.617, 29/07/2007, 9

2.815, 68.05, 140.70, 14:18:21.817, 29/07/2007, 9

3.015, 73.80, 161.50, 14:18:22.017, 29/07/2007, 9

3.215, 79.11, 183.92, 14:18:22.217, 29/07/2007, 9

3.415, 83.06, 207.71, 14:18:22.417, 29/07/2007, 9

3.615, 83.13, 232.08, 14:18:22.617, 29/07/2007, 9

3.815, 87.88, 257.16, 14:18:22.817, 29/07/2007, 9

4.015, 92.56, 283.63, 14:18:23.017, 29/07/2007, 9

4.215, 97.07, 311.44, 14:18:23.217, 29/07/2007, 9

4.415, 101.54, 340.57, 14:18:23.417, 29/07/2007, 9

4.615, 105.64, 370.95, 14:18:23.617, 29/07/2007, 9

4.815, 109.00, 402.43, 14:18:23.817, 29/07/2007, 9

5.015, 110.08, 434.57, 14:18:24.017, 29/07/2007, 9

5.215, 111.12, 467.01, 14:18:24.217, 29/07/2007, 9

5.415, 114.86, 500.15, 14:18:24.417, 29/07/2007, 9

5.615, 118.56, 534.38, 14:18:24.617, 29/07/2007, 9

5.815, 122.11, 569.68, 14:18:24.817, 29/07/2007, 9

6.015, 125.35, 605.97, 14:18:25.017, 29/07/2007, 9

6.215, 128.67, 643.23, 14:18:25.217, 29/07/2007, 9

6.415, 131.89, 681.44, 14:18:25.417, 29/07/2007, 9

6.615, 134.51, 720.51, 14:18:25.617, 29/07/2007, 9

6.815, 136.41, 760.25, 14:18:25.817, 29/07/2007, 9

7.015, 136.20, 800.23, 14:18:26.017, 29/07/2007, 9

7.215, 138.25, 840.48, 14:18:26.217, 29/07/2007, 9

7.415, 141.03, 881.44, 14:18:26.417, 29/07/2007, 9

7.615, 143.85, 923.22, 14:18:26.617, 29/07/2007, 9

7.815, 146.54, 965.81, 14:18:26.817, 29/07/2007, 9

8.015, 149.11, 1009.17, 14:18:27.017, 29/07/2007, 9

8.215, 151.66, 1053.28, 14:18:27.217, 29/07/2007, 9

8.415, 154.14, 1098.13, 14:18:27.417, 29/07/2007, 9

8.615, 156.60, 1143.71, 14:18:27.617, 29/07/2007, 9

8.815, 158.85, 1189.97, 14:18:27.817, 29/07/2007, 9

9.015, 160.97, 1236.88, 14:18:28.017, 29/07/2007, 9

9.215, 162.75, 1284.36, 14:18:28.217, 29/07/2007, 9

9.415, 164.07, 1332.29, 14:18:28.417, 29/07/2007, 9

9.615, 163.28, 1380.30, 14:18:28.617, 29/07/2007, 9

9.815, 164.80, 1428.41, 14:18:28.817, 29/07/2007, 9

10.015, 166.61, 1477.02, 14:18:29.017, 29/07/2007, 9

10.215, 168.51, 1526.17, 14:18:29.217, 29/07/2007, 9

10.415, 170.35, 1575.87, 14:18:29.417, 29/07/2007, 9

10.615, 172.09, 1626.09, 14:18:29.617, 29/07/2007, 9

10.815, 173.74, 1676.81, 14:18:29.817, 29/07/2007, 9

11.015, 175.54, 1728.04, 14:18:30.017, 29/07/2007, 9

11.215, 177.07, 1779.75, 14:18:30.217, 29/07/2007, 9

11.415, 178.63, 1831.92, 14:18:30.417, 29/07/2007, 9

11.615, 180.13, 1884.54, 14:18:30.617, 29/07/2007, 9

11.815, 181.65, 1937.60, 14:18:30.817, 29/07/2007, 9

12.015, 183.16, 1991.10, 14:18:31.017, 29/07/2007, 9

12.215, 184.73, 2045.06, 14:18:31.217, 29/07/2007, 9

12.415, 186.02, 2099.43, 14:18:31.417, 29/07/2007, 9

12.615, 187.31, 2154.19, 14:18:31.617, 29/07/2007, 9

12.815, 188.83, 2209.35, 14:18:31.817, 29/07/2007, 9

13.015, 190.03, 2264.92, 14:18:32.017, 29/07/2007, 9

13.215, 191.36, 2320.85, 14:18:32.217, 29/07/2007, 9

13.415, 192.70, 2377.18, 14:18:32.417, 29/07/2007, 9

13.615, 193.76, 2433.86, 14:18:32.617, 29/07/2007, 9

13.815, 195.00, 2490.88, 14:18:32.817, 29/07/2007, 9

14.015, 196.16, 2548.25, 14:18:33.017, 29/07/2007, 9

14.215, 197.16, 2605.93, 14:18:33.217, 29/07/2007, 9

14.415, 198.22, 2663.92, 14:18:33.417, 29/07/2007, 9

14.615, 199.37, 2722.23, 14:18:33.617, 29/07/2007, 9

14.815, 200.30, 2780.85, 14:18:33.817, 29/07/2007, 9

15.015, 201.16, 2839.72, 14:18:34.017, 29/07/2007, 9

15.215, 202.03, 2898.86, 14:18:34.217, 29/07/2007, 9

15.415, 202.83, 2958.23, 14:18:34.417, 29/07/2007, 9

15.615, 203.41, 3017.81, 14:18:34.617, 29/07/2007, 9

15.815, 204.49, 3077.64, 14:18:34.817, 29/07/2007, 9

16.015, 205.01, 3137.70, 14:18:35.017, 29/07/2007, 9

16.215, 205.82, 3197.95, 14:18:35.217, 29/07/2007, 9

16.415, 206.41, 3258.41, 14:18:35.417, 29/07/2007, 9

16.615, 206.04, 3318.90, 14:18:35.617, 29/07/2007, 9

16.815, 203.72, 3378.99, 14:18:35.817, 29/07/2007, 9

17.015, 201.45, 3438.42, 14:18:36.017, 29/07/2007, 9

17.215, 198.83, 3497.12, 14:18:36.217, 29/07/2007, 9

17.415, 195.67, 3554.98, 14:18:36.417, 29/07/2007, 9

17.615, 192.64, 3611.93, 14:18:36.617, 29/07/2007, 9

17.815, 190.04, 3668.05, 14:18:36.817, 29/07/2007, 9

18.015, 187.43, 3723.42, 14:18:37.017, 29/07/2007, 9

18.215, 184.73, 3778.00, 14:18:37.217, 29/07/2007, 9

18.415, 182.18, 3831.81, 14:18:37.417, 29/07/2007, 9

18.615, 179.31, 3884.83, 14:18:37.617, 29/07/2007, 9

18.815, 176.81, 3937.06, 14:18:37.817, 29/07/2007, 9

19.015, 174.28, 3988.55, 14:18:38.017, 29/07/2007, 9

19.215, 171.45, 4039.25, 14:18:38.217, 29/07/2007, 9

19.415, 168.43, 4089.10, 14:18:38.417, 29/07/2007, 9

19.615, 165.58, 4138.09, 14:18:38.617, 29/07/2007, 9

19.815, 162.61, 4186.22, 14:18:38.817, 29/07/2007, 9

20.015, 159.92, 4233.52, 14:18:39.017, 29/07/2007, 9

20.215, 157.53, 4280.08, 14:18:39.217, 29/07/2007, 9

20.415, 155.24, 4325.95, 14:18:39.417, 29/07/2007, 9

20.615, 152.97, 4371.16, 14:18:39.617, 29/07/2007, 9

In addition to the spread sheets which are generated, there is also a raw data file which I have used to create the graph below:

CowieGraph.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...