Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what mph are you crossing the line at?

and was it 121hp or kw, cause i don't think you could do it with 123hp, even if you had drag slicks. if it was 121kw then i could believe it since i managed a 14.8 out of a magna with a 60ft time 0.187 slower than you. if i got a 2.0 60ft i'd be somewhere round the 14.5 mark.

i also notice that the dyno run you have posted says in the description that you say the car has a blocked cat, so if it does, what does it run without the blocked cat?

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

once again to clear things up, the car ran 123rwhp on the blocked cat, the 1/4 mile run was done with a new cat

No slicks were used, i explained what the car has done to it, nothing more nothing less.

If anyone lives in WA and wants to verify that it is what i say it is, then they are more than welcome to inspect the car.

Im not rogercordia, i dont have a need to make up bullshit

Im not rogercordia

rofl...

your brother may have set a new bench mark for NA times. i'll take it down the strip when i get a spare chance.

i make 115kw, which is roughly 150HP - we'll see how it compares.

i make 115kw, which is roughly 150HP

Have you got any mods? If so, what mods.

My RB25DE with only cat-back exhaust (probably makes no diff anyway) make 115kw aswell. No other mods, I am sure of that :whistling:

didn't dial any timing in. it's still whatever it is from the factory or previous owner.

the safc was to clean up the afr a bit not for any sort of power.

most of my mods are based around suspension parts and setup, not power.

although i might have to put some in to try this drag racing thing you guys call racing.

although i might have to put some in to try this drag racing thing you guys call racing.

hahahaha, i'm kinda the opposite, mostly been racing my cars down the strip but with the new gt-four im keen to throw it around a track, even if it does mean i'm just going around in circles....

Vote1 for Shaved head/thinner head gasket.

Increases CR a bit.

Most likely a few degrees extra dialled in on the CAS.

Check what timing it runs at idle, unsure on the GTS, but on the GTS-t it should be 15degrees.

Vote1 for Shaved head/thinner head gasket.

Increases CR a bit.

Most likely a few degrees extra dialled in on the CAS.

Check what timing it runs at idle, unsure on the GTS, but on the GTS-t it should be 15degrees.

It definately has timing smashed into it, i said that on the first page. From memory the cas is pretty much maxed out so its probably running around 25 degrees of timing at idle lol, which kinda throws the shaved head out the door cause with the extra CR and all that timing its would be pinging its nuts off all day long which isnt the case

Im getting my n/a tuned it already has a catback and coldair/pod. It is getting a piggyback system,cams and a lightened flywheel. When its all done ill scan the drag slip onto the computer :O

good stuff, post up what power you get after the tune aswell :D

anyone else has got a time to post up please do, i wanted to get some general comparision going to set a general bench mark for n/a owners but the thread kinda got sidetracked lol

there is the oppportunity if me might being able to do a 1/4 mle in november but i dont know if i want to cause my poor engine is tired and im ummmm'ing and rrr'ing about whether to do it or not..................

there is the oppportunity if me might being able to do a 1/4 mle in november but i dont know if i want to cause my poor engine is tired and im ummmm'ing and rrr'ing about whether to do it or not..................

just do it... lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...