Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I still think Honda Civic Type-R or integra type-r is much better than celica or corolla. pity civic type-r is not available here.

I have seen a jap video tape (not sure if it is best motoring). Celica, civic and integra were on the race, civic and integra passed the celica up hill just like that!!! in the end integra came first and civic came second. I must say civic is such a fast car...

well 8200 cos its a four cyliner remember! my dads M3 revs that high as well, but hehe that doesnt compare lol. ne ways mate overall a skyline is much better in my eyes, a coralla is simply a corolla and thats what it will always be even if they chucked a V12 in one and made it a 400 kmh super car

I looked at this car too. Thought it was excellent value. I was actually gunna sell my S15 for it cos I was going through a silly stage. Lucky I changed my mind, I will keep my S15. ( For a while anyway)

I still bought the sportivo but it will be our second car for my gf to drive to work and do the shopping. I will let u all know how it goes when I get my hands on it and wring it's neck. Should be ready tomorrow on the 10/7. And it's red btw.

  • 2 weeks later...

Not that I always believe what I read in magazines and papers, but a recent review in the Sydney Morning Herald panned it severly.

The review reminded me of the Corolla SX 100 kw I used to own. Great engine but the rest of the car was a piece of shit. Steered and handled like a overpowered shoping trolley and had pathetic brakes. Pity the Civic Type R is not sold here as apparrently that is the car to have if you want a FWD hatch. ;)

I am not been harsh at all. The SX was failry crappy in its day and quite bad now. Just drive one and see. A mate had a Integra of similar vintage (and much highre kms) and it was much better dymanically on the road. And that generation LS Integra wasn't the best thing around even then.

And the new Sportivo is more of the same - read the reviews. Journalists can be right some of the time.

Hmmm, interesting... But i really dont like the way corolla looks, their ugly, well not my type... They really dont have any agresive looks on it, just looks like an any ordinary corolla to me!

But i wouldnt mind a Focus ST170, i seen few of them on road and damn they are nice, and look like a pure WRC car! and i think they got something like a 140kw n/a from a Zetec . not bad at all for n/a ha? Europe is releasing a 230kw Focus 4WD 2.0 turbo 6 speed manuel version using a Cosworth engine, after seeing the success of the RS Focus over their. Apparently when the RS Focus Turbo came out, they were sold in few days all of em, and only 500 came out. They are ok though, their FWD 2.0 Turbo and do mid/high 14's!

car is not all about preformance!! Corolla is a family car, now with a better engine, that's it. Have driven 1 of them (new corolla), very nice car, good handling and ride quaility, i like it. I will take it over a N/A skyline at any day.

each to there own, but not much feels as responsive handling wise to a skyline, i have driven a lot of performance cars from aussy HSV's to crazy imports and higher end Euro's like the M3 and have not found one that feels better on the road then the skyline. Ive driven a 32 a few 33's and one 34 and i reckon the 32 is eaasily the best but the 33 is not far of it and i would not by another car till i get old and my but starts to get sore from a stiff ride and i need something a little softer but for now nothing feels better then a skyline.

i recently was taking for a ride in a corollo of the current generation, but not the sportivo 141kw version.

to my suprise, he had a good amount of grip, especially having 4 guys in the car as well.

Driving in my own car along side him, there would be much of a contest in straight line, as soon as u were in the fun zone, last 3000rpm of your tacho, you would pull away easy.

Originally posted by hakosuka

and there is no way a NA Zetec gets 140 kw......

why not?

is it because you think ford make crap engines?

is it because you dislike the way the car looks?

making a N/A car produce big power figures isnt hard, making it have a decent spread of torque across the rev range IS hard.

Look at honda Vtec engines, they make very good power for NA cars, but the reason why their engines are good isnt because they produce high numbers, its because they can still produce resaonable torque across the rev range AND also have healthy peak power figures.

Yes :)

Ford do make crap engines - as well as crap cars - generally unrefined, it is tradition and history shows it, althought the XR6 turbo donk is very good - still it took them 10 year to build something of a similar spec to a RB26DETT. Admittedly they are getting better now.

Ford will never be known as an engine builder like Honda or Nissan is - their cars are made for the great unwashed. :shake:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ironically the GTT was quite reliable in the 7 years of ownership. From memory I've only had to replace a radiator and coilpacks out of inconvenience 
    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
×
×
  • Create New...