Jump to content
SAU Community

Is Pauly33GTS-t Sig Too Big  

25 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Now don't take offense to this paully i'm trying to be tactful but i think your signature is too large and falls outside of SAU's signature guidelines of

now i don't want this to turn into a slinging fest of harassment but keep comments clean and posative

# Combined Text and Image signatures to be kept within 600x200 pixels

# Keep text to within the above dimensions

while im @ work its a full pg up or dwn to just get through your signature

post-13315-1186993599_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180672-is-pauly-sig-too-big/
Share on other sites

it dont look so big on my screen at all and im running 1600x900...

The whole point in complaining about a big sig is that it takes a long time to load, but since madaz is being such a big freakin girl about it. I'll change it for the good of the 15 inch LCD hes running SAU on in 640x480 rez.

If you had a problem about it, come to me next time. stop being a bitch honestly. I expect an apology.

-Pauly. (NOTE THE SINGLE "L" IN "PAULY" ASWELL)

post-32965-1187004855_thumb.jpg

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

yes see, mines all text, but ill change it anyway cause as I said, no one told me about it...

talk about ratting someone out in a different context...

its not like my sig or avatar takes 45 minutes to load on 56k ull find it shows up pretty much in under 0.2ms.

Madaz you right... but you know since ur going down this path.

Your signiature falls outside SAU's limits of 600x200 by being 478 x 275 big.

So. Im changing mine to be within the guidelines, but if the hypocrit that started this thread can also be f**ked, he should change his too.

I think this crap should be locked, and cubes can you edit the title to have "Pauly" spelt correctly. thanks.

I voted for "my cats name is mittens".

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

Your 100% correct Pauly i didn't start this thread thinking i was above the signature guidelines I've never had anyone complain about my sig.. as yet and am more than happy to review and make necessary changes as seen fit.

and for the most part most people here adhere pretty close to the guidelines but come on man show a little respect

for those interested the screen shot was taken on server 2003 its a 800x600 terminal

your signature is still rather large but its a vast improvement even Pete (ax53b70p25) has done more mods to his car and fits it in a nice compact blurb if you wish to read it

for all those concerned about there sigs im not the sig natzi many of you know i make allot of the sigs you see in the Adelaide section i even made a befitting one for Pauly to which i understand if he doesn't wish to use it

you mean the one that told me to screw his sister as a retort?

Yes id love to spend my time reading his signiature since following by his examples would be worth my while.

You made a stupid signiature for me which i did not wish to use and if you did the right thing we wouldnt be in this predicament.

I'm willing to forgive all and forget but i think that you want to keep going on as some sort of mascarade of bullshit.

now /quit rage please.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...