Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Just want to know, what are peoples thoughts on the advantages of a flywheel? Do you guys believe there are any power gains to be made on a dyno? From what I've read there is no dyno difference however on the street, it is like having 101lbs less weight on the street???

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180880-flywheel-advantages/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

also depends what you want the car for. Some like the lightweight one that will rev good... but it does lose some power from revving so easily as there is no momentum behind the flywheel, if you have a dogbox or a very heavy clutch might also be better to get a chromolly flywheel that is heavier for the added strengh

ALSO... if you are replacing the clutch too might be best to get a flywheel clutch combo cause different compound clutches n flywheels will make it slip or chatter. Big writeup a few issues ago in HPI

Edited by choku_dori

Yeh, i gotta replace the clutch now its slipping a fair bit. I'm looking at getting the nismo sports clutch kit, and the flywheel works out to be $350 extra. I heard the other way around, that because the flywheel is lighter, makes it easier for the power to be transmitted through the drivetrain and to the rear wheels, in the end leading to better power to weight ratios. On the dyno figures would be minimal but on the street was told acceleration changes significantly??? Is this true?

a big rock takes longer to gain speed when rolling, but harder to stop once rolling than a smaller rock.

rough example. When a car is in 1st gear engine sees maybe 200kg in 2nd 500kg 3rd900 and so on. If you can remove weight before the gearbox and diff (torque multiplers) you engine sees less weight and can accelerate faster for the same power.

So you won't gain power on a dyno but you will gain response on the road.

You will find that it will rev faster and will be great for the street / track/ and drags, butyou loose torque because it's lighter and doesn't have the momentum to keep spinning which is what you want then drifting and rallying.

I lightened mine when getting a new clutch. I believe this is how it works, tell me if I'm wrong. While you don't get any extra power, if you have 230rwkw (and let's say that's 280atf), then with a lightened flywheel, you'll still have 280atf, but you might have 234-235kw actually reaching the tyres because less energy is lost in the drivetrain. When I got mine installed, I accidentally redlined it in second the first time I planted from a dead holt to 100kph, cos I was used to changing by feel and timing, but because the engine went through the rev range quickly, she bounced lol. I like the feel of it, in fact so much that I'm interested in lightening other parts of the drivetrain to get more of the power I'm already making to the ground. Seems like a relatively cheap way to maximise use of the powr you're making and I plan to go nuts later RE power, so I will want to do it sooner or later.

no power gains as such but the less weight your engine has to turn eg flywheel and clutch assembly, gearbox, tail shaft, diff, wheels the quicker it can accelerate.

Remember gran turismo you could get a racing flywheel and carbon fibre tail shaft and you drop .3-.4 off your 1/4 mile time on a stock s13 or similar!

no power gains as such but the less weight your engine has to turn eg flywheel and clutch assembly, gearbox, tail shaft, diff, wheels the quicker it can accelerate.

Remember gran turismo you could get a racing flywheel and carbon fibre tail shaft and you drop .3-.4 off your 1/4 mile time on a stock s13 or similar!

Well if it is in gran tourismo it must be true.

In reality a kilo or so in amongst 1500kg of car is undetectable. In no way is a lightened flywheel either a significant gain (as some would have you believe) or a loss (As other argue).

The only time you will ever motice it is when the clutch is in. The reduction in inertia allows the motor to pick up and/or drop revs more quickly. You may also notice the lesser amount of inertia when you drop the clutch.

Edited by djr81
In reality a kilo or so in amongst 1500kg of car is undetectable. In no way is a lightened flywheel either a significant gain (as some would have you believe) or a loss (As other argue).

The only time you will ever motice it is when the clutch is in. The reduction in inertia allows the motor to pick up and/or drop revs more quickly. You may also notice the lesser amount of inertia when you drop the clutch.

Yes, it's more noticeable in neutral and just free revving it, but I've got a buttload of sound deadening and a big sub box, and I could PLAINLY tell the difference during normal driving. I could accelerate faster - It was night and day, hence why I redlined well before I was expecting to (after having driven the car in the same configuration for 2 years, I had a good feel for when I had to change, and I usually change about 2k BEFORE redline. That's gotta say something! And because of my sound deadening, I'm sure it's not having as big effect as it does on a car that's been lightened in other ways!

I would agree with others though, it's not worth doing unless the clutch is being opened up anyway, otherwise there are definitely cheaper ways to (initially) go faster.

Yes, it's more noticeable in neutral and just free revving it, but I've got a buttload of sound deadening and a big sub box, and I could PLAINLY tell the difference during normal driving. I could accelerate faster - It was night and day, hence why I redlined well before I was expecting to (after having driven the car in the same configuration for 2 years, I had a good feel for when I had to change, and I usually change about 2k BEFORE redline. That's gotta say something! And because of my sound deadening, I'm sure it's not having as big effect as it does on a car that's been lightened in other ways!

I would agree with others though, it's not worth doing unless the clutch is being opened up anyway, otherwise there are definitely cheaper ways to (initially) go faster.

Well, not to be rude, but I am sure you couldn't. Plainly or otherwise. The difference in hp or weight you need to be able to detect a change is quite marked & most people only think they can feel something simply because they already know it is there. In any case you get used to changes that quickly it is not funny.

The difference in rotational mass compared to static mass is substantial. Taking 2 kg off the flywheel makes far more of a difference than taking 2 kg of the car body for acceleration purposes.

Be prepared for decreaced fuel economy, not that this really maters on a performance car.

This goes for drive shafts and tyre/rims. You will definitley feel the difference with heavier rims..!!

I'd change to lighter flywheel if I had my g/box out.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29
The difference in rotational mass compared to static mass is substantial. Taking 2 kg off the flywheel makes far more of a difference than taking 2 kg of the car body for acceleration purposes.

Be prepared for decreaced fuel economy, not that this really maters on a performance car.

This goes for drive shafts and tyre/rims. You will definitley feel the difference with heavier rims..!!

I'd change to lighter flywheel if I had my g/box out.

Cheers,

Well I can't be arsed doing the calculation, but please feel free to do it for the rest of us. In a linear state kinetic energy is equal to half the mass times the square of the velocity.

In a rotational circumstance the equation is similar, but obviously uses the polar moment of inertia instead of the mass & the velocity is measured in radians per second rather than meters per second.

Whilst removing the weight from the flywheel is more effective than just removing sound deadener or whatever it is still not significant. You will find it is << 1% of the total energy which is basically undetectable unless you are either psychic or have a shed load of data logging & alot of time on your hands.

Edited by djr81
Well I can't be arsed doing the calculation, but please feel free to do it for the rest of us. In a linear state kinetic energy is equal to half the mass times the square of the velocity.

In a rotational circumstance the equation is similar, but obviously uses the polar moment of inertia instead of the mass & the velocity is measured in radians per second rather than meters per second.

Whilst removing the weight from the flywheel is more effective than just removing sound deadener or whatever it is still not significant. You will find it is << 1% of the total energy which is basically undetectable unless you are either psychic or have a shed load of data logging & alot of time on your hands.

Mate, comparing the effectiveness of a lightened flywheel is far more complicated than the equations you have pointed out. There are many factors such as gear/diff ratio which amplify the load reduction on the engine during acceleration. Highest improvements in acceleration is in the lower gears and less effective within the higher ones. Depending on the engine, g/box, diff etc, you can reduce the effective weight of your car significantly (in first-second gear). Without going into the details which requires some serious calcs, let me assure you that you will definitely notice the difference of a lightweight flywheel. :P

Mind you it does have draw-backs.

Cheers,

Edited by PX29

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...