Jump to content
SAU Community

Engine Rebuilds  

35 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

ok so what you guys think

i was f**king around on nengun before just clicking what i wanted without even thinking about the budget

raked up over 10 grand lmao

is it better to buy all the parts and hand them over to a workshop? to install?

or is it better to do it completely through them

some workshops cant source certain parts thou...

better option cost and effectiveness

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181035-which-option-is-better-poll/
Share on other sites

I would say it's better to get the parts you want then get a workshop to install them for you because if you got the workshop to do everything, they'll charge you on the time they used to search for the parts. Not sure if they'll actually charge you on the time used to search for the parts, but I would assume they would?

Definitely source all the parts yourself.

Much MUCH CHEAPER than getting it at one place.

Although they will give u a discount, it would still cost alot more than if you were to source the parts yourself.

And if you are purchasing overseas, watch out for import fees and taxes.

Most people are lucky, but you could get caught out and pay heaps.

All depends on the parts in question as to who would be cheaper.

Buying all parts yourself inst necessarily the cheapest way, and people saying so as incorrect.

eg. Fuel pump. Why pay $$$ for a Jap one when your mech can probably get a Bosch one trade, for half the price of the Jap one.

All depends on the parts in question as to who would be cheaper.

Buying all parts yourself inst necessarily the cheapest way, and people saying so as incorrect.

eg. Fuel pump. Why pay $$$ for a Jap one when your mech can probably get a Bosch one trade, for half the price of the Jap one.

:/ didn't think about that.

WE all want to do a job at the cheapest price, which is not exactly what the owner of any business wants as he has to pay the overheads and make a profit to stay in business and support you if you have problems later!

But why not give the option to the "Workshop" to quote the labour and the parts AND give them the pricing you sourced and supplier name as well?

This will give them the opportunity to see where your coming from, and for both of you to agree on the price and mutual plan of source and supply.

Remember there can be great benefits to working with a workshop where they know they will make a reasonable margin and you will know they will do a great job and look after you if there are any hicupps along the way.

In most cases you always get what you pay for, - pay peanuts and you get what monkeys would do!

No I don't own an Automotive workshop! :/

i also agree with turbox. if you walk in with an armful of parts they will charge you more in labour than if you had let them get them for you. also if you have a problem with a part that isn't caused by their installing it wrong you have to go where you bought it and the workshop may charge you to remove the old one and fit the new one, which i see is fair since they shouldn't have to do work for free if all they did was fit something you bought elsewhere.

as for the price of parts through the workshop, more often than not they are charging you retail price for it. they buy it at trade price and then put their mark-up on it which brings it up to retail. companies like nengun don't carry the stuff in stock, they just order straight from the supplier and have it sent to you, so they don't have to worry about paying big rent, insurance and other overheads that a workshop has, and they work off a quantity bassis. the more they can sell the cheaper they can have the prices to get the same profit.

Better off buying the parts through the traders on this site. I mean they're cheaper than trade prices at places like Repco etc. And performance shops buy shops buy some of there parts from repco etc. so go figure.

Just for a laugh I went into my local performance shop and inquired how much an 040 installed would be, he said $370 for the pump and wouldn't quote on labour (piss weak). I paid $200 for the 040 through this forum and installed it myself for free.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...