Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i said to them i had safc..

i think they overpriced on me..

how long does it usally take to tune SAFC?

1 hr with an expereinced tuner, maybe less for hitman.

Not too much to change.

Okay just spoke to Matt(Hitman). And he quoted $250 fora safc2, and profec2 , both fit and tuned which I reckon is wayy more cheaper than some of the other quotes Ive had so far. So HITMAN! it is then.

That's fregan awesome by anyones standards !

Don't forget to post the results :(

Okay just spoke to Matt(Hitman). And he quoted $250 fora safc2, and profec2 , both fit and tuned which I reckon is wayy more cheaper than some of the other quotes Ive had so far. So HITMAN! it is then.

wow i gotta call him stright away!!

did you tell him youve got the number from SAU??

I did mention that I got his number from SAU. Well i mentioned that to JEM as well who didnt seem to give 2 hoots about it. Anyways Hitman sounded a lot more pleasant and 'customer satisfactory'.. if there is anything like that.

i gave him a call and he quote me 250 for SAFC 1 and 50 for manual boost controller which is turbotech.

why did i get more that them? F!@#$K anyway its way cheaper than ive been quoted so far!

Probably because the installation is the easy part for both controllers.

then adjusting...

the electronic ones to adjust, you press buttons or turn dials to get the desired boost you want.

most have a display on them that shows you what you are setting it to.

the turbo tech is just a knob.

you turn it, do a run and see what boost it makes, then turn it some more and dyno again.. repeat until you have the desired boost level..

so it takes a few goes to get it "adjusted" the the setting you want.

that's why you got charged $50 extra.

Probably because the installation is the easy part for both controllers.

then adjusting...

the electronic ones to adjust, you press buttons or turn dials to get the desired boost you want.

most have a display on them that shows you what you are setting it to.

the turbo tech is just a knob.

you turn it, do a run and see what boost it makes, then turn it some more and dyno again.. repeat until you have the desired boost level..

so it takes a few goes to get it "adjusted" the the setting you want.

that's why you got charged $50 extra.

yes that makes sense

but 300 is still so~~~ cheap!!! very good!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...