Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cost of the chip was about $500 plus the dyno time... now that i think about it now, Apexi Power FC's are starting to go real cheap, ($1300+) and that would be a better proposition now if i were to recommend something now...

I make 241rwkw in my R32 GTR which has the above mentioned chipped ECU, full upgraded exhaust from the turbos back - HKS dumps, Apexi front pipes, and a custom 3.5" Mandrel bent exhaust, K&N Pods and boost spikes as high as 16psi with standard turbos using a bleed valve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-379185
Share on other sites

Mr R32 M-Spec,

Try emailing Lucas from Perth ([email protected]), he has many maps for many cars and can reprogram ROMS to your specification. His SR20 "BikiROM's" have been selling like hotcakes lately, now shipping them to workshops overeast.

The RB20 computer is really easily reprogrammed so its probably the cheapest option and still allows alot of scope for increased horsepower.

Im not sure about cost, but ill bet its cheaper than Chiptorque.

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-379714
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
There is only one ecu that you should be buying and that is autronic

they ahve their good points but are still not legal you get caught with one an you are owned plusa the cost of instalation and tuning is very high.

plus why go after market when the factory chip can be reprogrammed?

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421253
Share on other sites

Woops, poor Autronic got reamed, control ECU in V8s means all car are now using Motec.

Oh and despite many teams using Autronic when the rules allowed, not many of could afford the SM2 with all the fruit, just like many of us cant afford an M800 Motec ECU with all the fruit. (Thats an assumption that they use the top models)

Mort, have you set up any SMCs on RB20s?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421274
Share on other sites

they use the M48, all owned by tega, maximum of 1 igntion output and all they can change are fuel and ignition maps, pit lane limiters and so on are all programmed by tega, who can ask for the ecu and replace it with another with no warning

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421282
Share on other sites

So the control ECU has limited the teams ability to use many of the other features? They still get all the data logging dont they?

Im assuming they are still able to trim mixtures etc for individual cylinders etc etc. Tega i imagine are pretty paranoid about traction control and the like.

As for the ECU im using, well at the moment factory, but i took the easy road and after a lot of patience and delays i get my Power Fc this week.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421298
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Is it worth paying the extra cost to get both powerfc & the hand controller? As most tuning workshop who can do powerfc should have the hand controller, once it's set nice, do you need the hand controller yourself to change something from time to time?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-462976
Share on other sites

One of the workshops in Perth borrows the dataloggit to do the tuning of the PowerFC, provides more features and is much quicker to tune then using the hand controller.

I have the Wolf 3D Ver4 Plug'n'play computer in my car. It's been great and has lots of advanced features that many other aftermarket computers don't.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-462985
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
power fc would be on the top of the list for me, just plug in and they come with a base programe that gives more power with out being tuned then just drive to your dyno place and get them to tune it. i guess you would save money on the fitting process as well motec make a plug in as well that is sposed to be good.

I have been looking into the autronic smc and sm2 and both have the "autotune" option which is most valuable if u want to drive it to the tuner to have it further fine tuned.

http://www.autronic.com/autotune.html

My only concern is this:- "After the tuning is complete the analyzer and 02 sensor is longer need. At any time after tuning is finished the values in the target closed loop table can be changed, and the engine will automatically run the new air fuel ratio"

using the o2 sensor continously would be more ideal.

Has anyone heard of running the autronic with an o2 sensor (closed loop).

The cheapest PFC and controller I can find brand new is $980 and $355 respectively. And that's delivered. Pretty good value I reckon. Try www.greenline.jp

This is also the price I got, don't forget postage isn't included.

I have been reading up on the FC and have found limited info, so far i've found that the FC when tuned on pc is only available in japanese, I have heard rumours that there is an english version available but havent been able to find it.

Any ideas on this?.

Also can the FC be used without numerious features that are on skylines like air con etc..

I would like to use the fc in a car that was originally carby and doesnt have air con etc.., anyone know just how flexible the FC is with this kind of thing?.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-716558
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...