Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cost of the chip was about $500 plus the dyno time... now that i think about it now, Apexi Power FC's are starting to go real cheap, ($1300+) and that would be a better proposition now if i were to recommend something now...

I make 241rwkw in my R32 GTR which has the above mentioned chipped ECU, full upgraded exhaust from the turbos back - HKS dumps, Apexi front pipes, and a custom 3.5" Mandrel bent exhaust, K&N Pods and boost spikes as high as 16psi with standard turbos using a bleed valve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-379185
Share on other sites

Mr R32 M-Spec,

Try emailing Lucas from Perth ([email protected]), he has many maps for many cars and can reprogram ROMS to your specification. His SR20 "BikiROM's" have been selling like hotcakes lately, now shipping them to workshops overeast.

The RB20 computer is really easily reprogrammed so its probably the cheapest option and still allows alot of scope for increased horsepower.

Im not sure about cost, but ill bet its cheaper than Chiptorque.

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-379714
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
There is only one ecu that you should be buying and that is autronic

they ahve their good points but are still not legal you get caught with one an you are owned plusa the cost of instalation and tuning is very high.

plus why go after market when the factory chip can be reprogrammed?

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421253
Share on other sites

Woops, poor Autronic got reamed, control ECU in V8s means all car are now using Motec.

Oh and despite many teams using Autronic when the rules allowed, not many of could afford the SM2 with all the fruit, just like many of us cant afford an M800 Motec ECU with all the fruit. (Thats an assumption that they use the top models)

Mort, have you set up any SMCs on RB20s?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421274
Share on other sites

they use the M48, all owned by tega, maximum of 1 igntion output and all they can change are fuel and ignition maps, pit lane limiters and so on are all programmed by tega, who can ask for the ecu and replace it with another with no warning

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421282
Share on other sites

So the control ECU has limited the teams ability to use many of the other features? They still get all the data logging dont they?

Im assuming they are still able to trim mixtures etc for individual cylinders etc etc. Tega i imagine are pretty paranoid about traction control and the like.

As for the ECU im using, well at the moment factory, but i took the easy road and after a lot of patience and delays i get my Power Fc this week.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-421298
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Is it worth paying the extra cost to get both powerfc & the hand controller? As most tuning workshop who can do powerfc should have the hand controller, once it's set nice, do you need the hand controller yourself to change something from time to time?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-462976
Share on other sites

One of the workshops in Perth borrows the dataloggit to do the tuning of the PowerFC, provides more features and is much quicker to tune then using the hand controller.

I have the Wolf 3D Ver4 Plug'n'play computer in my car. It's been great and has lots of advanced features that many other aftermarket computers don't.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-462985
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
power fc would be on the top of the list for me, just plug in and they come with a base programe that gives more power with out being tuned then just drive to your dyno place and get them to tune it. i guess you would save money on the fitting process as well motec make a plug in as well that is sposed to be good.

I have been looking into the autronic smc and sm2 and both have the "autotune" option which is most valuable if u want to drive it to the tuner to have it further fine tuned.

http://www.autronic.com/autotune.html

My only concern is this:- "After the tuning is complete the analyzer and 02 sensor is longer need. At any time after tuning is finished the values in the target closed loop table can be changed, and the engine will automatically run the new air fuel ratio"

using the o2 sensor continously would be more ideal.

Has anyone heard of running the autronic with an o2 sensor (closed loop).

The cheapest PFC and controller I can find brand new is $980 and $355 respectively. And that's delivered. Pretty good value I reckon. Try www.greenline.jp

This is also the price I got, don't forget postage isn't included.

I have been reading up on the FC and have found limited info, so far i've found that the FC when tuned on pc is only available in japanese, I have heard rumours that there is an english version available but havent been able to find it.

Any ideas on this?.

Also can the FC be used without numerious features that are on skylines like air con etc..

I would like to use the fc in a car that was originally carby and doesnt have air con etc.., anyone know just how flexible the FC is with this kind of thing?.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18133-aftermarket-ecus/#findComment-716558
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...