Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not a mechanical expert by any means but as far as I know there is not a huge amount of difference....

I know the clutch changed from a push type to a pull type (or the other way round) but I dont think there was any major changes otherwise.

Basically the fresher the engine the better!

Edited by HOSTILE
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3302681
Share on other sites

I am not a mechanical expert by any means but as far as I know there is not a huge amount of difference....

I know the clutch changed from a push type to a pull type (or the other way round) but I dont think there was any major changes otherwise.

what benifits are there having a 33 gtr engine in it over a 32 engine?

And the cons of it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3302696
Share on other sites

Its a year to half a decade newer?

lol yeah.... but no, there were subtle differences as each model was refined over the previous one... torque ratings also changed marginally too.

As I said I am no expert but things like minor head improvements/ valve springs things like this I believe to have been improved in later RB26s.

No real downside to having a newer motor.

Edited by HOSTILE
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3302720
Share on other sites

what benifits are there having a 33 gtr engine in it over a 32 engine?

And the cons of it

as far as i know they have fixed up the oil problems with the 33 engine, someone probably should confirm this, but thats about it for major imporvements, im sure they have done some further tweaking to it as well

the late modle r32 gtrs had the pull type clutch as well

i dont think there is a down side to having a 33 engine in it, as far as bolting it in its the same, so no tricky mounting issues, probably want to find out the turbos it has on it...

just think of it almost like having the engine rebuilt... thats a good thing right??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3302782
Share on other sites

as far as i know they have fixed up the oil problems with the 33 engine, someone probably should confirm this, but thats about it for major imporvements, im sure they have done some further tweaking to it as well

the late modle r32 gtrs had the pull type clutch as well

i dont think there is a down side to having a 33 engine in it, as far as bolting it in its the same, so no tricky mounting issues, probably want to find out the turbos it has on it...

just think of it almost like having the engine rebuilt... thats a good thing right??

i guess just asking so i dont get cought out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3302810
Share on other sites

Funny thing I've noticed with my car is that worse case scenario when I drive like my foot is attached to the floor isn't that much worse than when I drive like a granny. Conclusion: My foot stays planted now.

yeah i found this out in my GTS4 off boost and on boost = negligible km's

I am not a mechanical expert by any means but as far as I know there is not a huge amount of difference....

I know the clutch changed from a push type to a pull type (or the other way round) but I dont think there was any major changes otherwise.

Basically the fresher the engine the better!

the main difference between 33 and 32 is transfer case and as pointed out engine torque and maybe oil

i was under the impression bog stock R32 GTR makes around 174 RWKW = 206ish flywheel KW this is what another user made here cant remember his user name for the life of me :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181578-gtr-sale/page/5/#findComment-3303854
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...