Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys I have a question. I am keen to have my ecu rechipped, with nistune

but I also have a ecutalk v2 display, I was wondering if the 2 were

compatible and if my ecutalk display would still work after having nistune installed.

I have done several searches on google and various forums and I have been unable to find any info. :laugh:

any help would go a long way thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5170133
Share on other sites

hey ppl, might be a silly question but does nistune use an afm?? eg, if wanting to upgrade to a z32afm, is it needed or not??

cheers

If someone was to make a map sensor replacement module for the nistune/stock ecu would there be much interest in something like this?

It can certainly be built but if theres no interest I won't bother researching it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5170937
Share on other sites

already looked into this. Should be very simple, read in map sensor values read in air temp sensor add correction factor output 0 - 5v signal back to the ecu. Main thing would be the need for a complete retune of entire map, but this effort could be minimized with extensive logging of afm and map values in parallel(Similar to the holden MAFless tunes). I believe some one has also used TPS as loading on an NA Vl commodore using nistune

Edited by Crans
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5170950
Share on other sites

Yep if you did no correction and just made sure it was linear in the range used from 0-5v it would still be very easy to tune.

Ah so many ideas and so little time. Need to get my car running and buy a decent oscilloscope so I can finish the VCT controller I've been carrying on about.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5171022
Share on other sites

Hey guys I have a question. I am keen to have my ecu rechipped, with nistune

but I also have a ecutalk v2 display, I was wondering if the 2 were

compatible and if my ecutalk display would still work after having nistune installed.

I have done several searches on google and various forums and I have been unable to find any info. :P

any help would go a long way thanks.

I can confirm my ecutalk v2 display (and 1.3.x windows software) work fine in my nistune'd R32 GTR. love the new 2.02 firmware with the user-configurable alarms and am gagging for the eventual logging to micro-sd.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5173040
Share on other sites

hey guys i just bought a r32 gts4 and was thinking of doing the nistune upgrade for the ecu, but i want to change it to a manual as well. would i need to get a manual ecu or a gtr ecu? or would it be fine once the daughterboard is installed? don't wanna upgrade then find out i need a new ecu lol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5175332
Share on other sites

the daughterboard can be reprogrammed for different ROM images. bascially we can put a manual program in auto ECU no problems

GTR ECU is completely different you wont be needing that in a GTS-4 unless doing an RB26 transplant with twin AFMs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5176244
Share on other sites

Are the daughterboards for 32GTSt and 32GTR the same?

Reason I am asking is I am looking at Nistuning my 32gtst but if I max out my z32 afm, I am wondering if I can swap the daughterboard in to a 32GTR ECU and get a GTR image loaded on there ? (and then run a GTR engine harness and twin afm's)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5176335
Share on other sites

Wanting to buy a board and tunning package to have a play with.

Any one else using it? What do you think f it?

How do you buy it? Ive sent emails no one answers

I bought and installed my Nistune daughterboard direct from the guys that make it.

It is installed in my S13, and was tuned by Mark @ MRC dyno in castle hill. I haven't had any issues with it, and for the price i think it is an excellent option.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5176539
Share on other sites

got a question for ya's

i have a type 4 daughter board in my r34.

I know that the daughter board has its own EEPROM that we can change the values in while tuning in nistune software. And the original ECU's EEPROM stays unchanged, we just tell the ECU to read from our new EEPROM. Is this correct?

If this is correct, could i tune my car on pump fuel 98, then take the hex file from the daughter board's EEPROM and burn it into the original ECU's EEPROM, then re-tune the daughter board as usual on e85 fuel? then i just have to run a couple of switch wires from the jumper pins on the original ECU to the dash and i have instant capability to drive on either fuel.

But is it even possible to burn a new image into the original ECU?

and can anyone see any major flaws in my idea?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181930-nistune/page/11/#findComment-5176589
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...