Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so I have searched and couldn't find anything so don't bash me!

I'd like to know what a 33 in VERY GOOD condition should do, ie 1/4 mile and 0 - 100, with stock turbo maxed out, ie ~200rw.

I saw a good thread with stock times of nissan/toyota/commos for a comparison, can't find it.

In comparison to stock vehicles, I would assume it shouuld match a soarer, 300zx, probably not a supra?

Edited by vault13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181963-whatll-it-do-200rw-33/
Share on other sites

What other mods?

An R33 with fuel pump, cooler, turbo back exhaust, button clutch and standard ECU making 205rwkw ran a 13.1 on street tires.

LTHLRB I think where his plates.

Depends on the driver, depends on your tires etc..

There are a million different variables that could effect that time.

Edited by abu

http://www.importdriver.com.au/Coupe_Targa.htm

if this chart is incorrect, apologies in advance. (the prices are way off, the web page is a little old, but the other figures seem fairly accurate)

EDIT - plus i believe these times are based on jap spec 100 RON fuel

Edited by into oblivion

Ok assuming all the related mods

pump

fmic

boost control

turbo back zorst

clutch

safc or tuned ecu

street tires

no pfc or injectors just stock turbo, no suspension mods

Hmmm so according to the times into oblivion posted, this should trounce a stock 300zx in the 1/4 and come pretty close to stock 33 GTR, probably not 32.

What about 0-100 time, anyone know?

What other mods?

An R33 with fuel pump, cooler, turbo back exhaust, button clutch and standard ECU making 205rwkw ran a 13.1 on street tires.

LTHLRB I think where his plates.

Depends on the driver, depends on your tires etc..

There are a million different variables that could effect that time.

Edited by vault13

200kw doing a 12.8 on street tyres???

my run was almost perfect......seen as i can only get 0.1 closer using drag radials.....had a 60ft of 2.025 and 105mph

the car is stock except those listed as i did them myself and bought it completely stock....had 144kw when i first got it.....

the car is stock except those listed as i did them myself and bought it completely stock....had 144kw when i first got it.....

thats some super skyline you got, i havent heard of anyone else making 200rwkw with a stock ecu

^^ mine's running 202rwkw @11psi. only mods are zorst, pod, intercooler, manual boost controller. was running 188rwkw on standard boost. i've seen a few other people pushin 200 with standard ecu,so it does happen

haven't taken her down the 1/4 yet though sorry vault13

Edited by into oblivion

i guess 2rismo has some expeirence in that area.. as in at the drags..

so im sure he would have mastered it.. if he did 12.80

i did 14 flat, with just full exhaust and no other mods (18s on front lol.. 17 rears.. 18s werent mine.. was borrowin rims, as mine had no thread on front)

Edited by siddr20

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...