Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Direct from the rice capital we have 2 x Bling Bling, fluro bling supper bling stickers / badges for auction to some lucky SAU person.

This is an NSW SAU once off auction with all proceeds going to the club.

All you need to do is place a bid for this fantastic bling product, which is the most blingiest mod you will EVER do to your bling line. This bling bling badge will be the envy of all other blinged blingers bling rides.

You obviously all want this on your car, so I best let you know what they are.

These 2 x Bling fluro stickers / badges come with a 6V 4 x AA portable power pack (Batteries not included) and a 12V adaptor for permanent in car operation. They come with numerous rotation of fluro bling bling flashing and scrolling so you can bling to your hearts content with any combo which gives you your ultimate bling experience. They can be fitted to the external around the boot or internally inside on a window. The size is about 15cm by 3cm.

One in Apexi and one in Nismo. Pics attached

Hosted video of the bling being bling.

Apexi

http://video.tinypic.com/player.php?v=4ktoa6o

Nismo

http://video.tinypic.com/player.php?v=6c4vlhg

The winning bling bling bidder will have first choice of which one you want with the next best auction winner to get the remaining one. If this blinger next highest bidder passes up this bling opportunity it will then be offered to the next bidder, so on and so on.

How did I come to own such a bling bling device I hear you ask. They were purchased prior to the NSW 07 SNS, but due to excessive drinking and a killer head ach I failed to bring them to the day and only found them on the week end. Was I blinged to find them, yep I sure was.

Ok post up your price and let the winner get blinged! I will mail or organise pick up with the lucky lucky winner.

Starting bid is $10, auction will run until 5pm Monday 3rd Sep 07.

But wait I hear you say "I want more!" If the bid gets above a mystery amount the winner will get a free years SAU membership.

Good luck you lucky bidders!

post-42-1188199797_thumb.jpg

post-42-1188199806_thumb.jpg

post-42-1188199815_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'll start off at $10...

Just because of this story.. :P

How did I come to own such a bling bling device I hear you ask. They were purchased prior to the NSW 07 SNS, but due to excessive drinking and a killer head ach I failed to bring them to the day and only found them on the week end. Was I blinged to find them, yep I sure was

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...