Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks sky...the result was only 2kw short of its best ever pump fuel figure. Considering how hard we used to push the pump fuel tunes its really impressive to almost top the figure given the limits set.

the plugs were everyones favorite BCPR7ES's....we ran something colder with different style electrode...even they were not the optimum plug for the application.

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

  • Replies 682
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

we use the Nissan CAS for pump fuel...have another set-up for race fuel when we 'wick it up'.

Edited by DiRTgarage
why would you change the cas? the vi-pec uses a digital signal

couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :P Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

Edited by DiRTgarage
couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :thumbsup: Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

ah yes so u do, i couldnt remember if it was you or mark that used that 'backwards' setup

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

No i will not always run the Japanese air filter...getting a pipe made up this week to suit 2 large K&N items.

Yeah its a nice result but its not a real indication of what it will do...the dyno printout is pretty useless as the line disappears off the page ill get Wanye to rescale it tomorrow. The AFR's read by the dyno on the 465 run were closer to 11 than 11.4...yikes! But this was may have been due to the plug change as it was spot on 11.4's the night before.

I do have a super dooper gearbox...its a PPG fully optioned straight cut dogbox. The car shouldn't see much less than 7000rpm down the strip if im on my game.

Took it for a run on my 'test track' today...its nuts already!

Edited by DiRTgarage
I was thinking something sequential. Is yours still a H pattern?

What ever you use it still takes nothing away from the car being nuts. Good work.

Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Edited by DiRTgarage
1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

Paul, are there 2 different trims of the GTR-s kit? Or did you bolt on 2 SR20 spec ones? When I bought mine they were advertised as a 700ps kit for Rb26.

Thanks

Edited by Evocoop
Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Hey paul, do you know what marks fastest time was with the hks t51r on street tyres?

Cheers, mat.

Haha, im keen to see his GTRS graph at 22psi vs the 25psi one

No doubt the single wouldnt be as much fun for what i use the GTR for compared to Pauls use, but then he's not worried about lag :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...