Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

My car is pretty stock, came from Japan about 4 weeks ago.

Only engine modifications it has is a back exhaust and pod filter.

Basically there is no rev limiter? I have rev'd it to 8,000rpm on occasions and backed off as it didn't stop at a limiter?

Red line starts at 7,500 if I am not wrong, and it should be limited at 7,800 if I am not mistaken?

I have spoken to a few other RB20 owners and they have also had the same issue. I guess the question I am asking is, did R32 RB20DET come out with a rev limiter?

I haven't checked the ECU yet, but I doubt it would have been altered as the car is very stock.. But what would I be looking for that would show the rev limiter has been removed?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Abu

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184518-rb20det-rev-limiter/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my mates rb20 revs past 8000 rpm too! he is scared to over rev it! he thinks there was no limiter so 8200 sounds possible

Yeah its very weird!

I usually rev my cars hard, but I actually really like this R32 and I'm looking after it haha

I don't want to be reving it past past recommended redline!

Has anyone experienced or seen a RB20 with a rev limiter, on standard ECU?

Edited by abu

It may be "apparently" higher because the spring on the tacho needle is getting a bit "soft", and letting the needle spin further than it should.

I've noticed the tacho readout on my Wolf handset is less than the tacho in the instrument cluster.

yep mine was 8,200 standard auto ecu

bashed it every monday night for 3 months making 230rwkw

no probs

pretty sure its still going now

8,200 far out. I would never rev it that hard.. well..

It struggles to rev kinda past 5,500 - 6,000 rpm due to being on standard turbo, stock intcooler and only having a cat back exhaust.

Once I get the turbo back exhaust on, cooler and bigger turbo on, with the WOLF tuned then I will rev it to that ;)

It may be "apparently" higher because the spring on the tacho needle is getting a bit "soft", and letting the needle spin further than it should.

I've noticed the tacho readout on my Wolf handset is less than the tacho in the instrument cluster.

Oh thats interesting..

No idea man, wont be able to check that until I get my WOLF in and tuned I guess, or I guess until it gets onto a dyno.

Edited by abu

7,800 is the factory,

mine had an auto box now a manual box, hasnt ever changed....i have it chiped and its still the same only the speed limited was put a fair bit higher.

it shouldnt have a problem reving that high even on stock turbo....just that you wont get stuff all power up there, so its kinda pointless to rev it that high. if you have an aftermarket turbo then go for it.

I can confirm this also.

the standard tacho is inaccurate. there is indeed a 7500 rpm limit with a hard cut at 7800. the tacho is almost 10% out. so 7500 + 10% = 8250 ;)

Is that right. Whats the reason for it being out, like where they released out from factory?

I haven't managed to actually hit limiter, even in the wet when having a bit of fun, but I tend to be cautious about how high its reving.

7,800 is the factory,

mine had an auto box now a manual box, hasnt ever changed....i have it chiped and its still the same only the speed limited was put a fair bit higher.

it shouldnt have a problem reving that high even on stock turbo....just that you wont get stuff all power up there, so its kinda pointless to rev it that high. if you have an aftermarket turbo then go for it.

Ohh ok thanks man.

Yeah no point reving it that hard unless you get power that high, which you wont on standard turbo. I don't tend to rev it past 6,500rpm as it is now as it beings to struggle.

But once I get it tuned with the WOLF I will get the limiter set to about 7,800 rpm.

With my standard ecu, mine hits the limite at 8300 but my RSM says 7600ish at the time dont hold it long enough to write it down ;)

8,300 rpm damn, thats high. Weird how they are out so much hey?

LOL @ dont hold it long enough to write it down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...