Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TT Car # Team Shake n Bake Vehicle type

895 Manion/Manion 33GTR V-spec N1 1995 Walker / Texas Ranger

979 Wooster/Kulhanek 34GTR V-spec II N1 2001 Jean Girard / Hershell

904 Millar/Dean Evo IX GSR 2006 Ricky Bobby / Cal Norton Jnr

962 Kennard/Grimwood Sti Spec C 2007 Larry Dennit, Jr. / Lucius Washington

Why? because we like to shake, then bake!

Edited by Marlin
  • Replies 369
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

stay off the yokos mr tom. they are rubbish which we only run because they are control tyres. expensive and far from the best.

but based on last year's experience I would say don't go the bridgestones either unless you can guarantee no rain :D

Team Release

Team “Shake n Bake” can’t wait for Targa 2008!

Thursday 27 March 2008

The social side of Targa almost outweighs the competitive side and as a bit of fun, a group of mates comprising of recent and past Targa competitors have banded together to enter the Targa Teams Section as Team “Shake n Bake”.

In the true spirit of racing these guys are hunting the 1st place 2008 Targa Team Trophy… “because if ya ain’t first, ya last!”

Team members are:

895 Manion/Manion 33GTR V-spec N1 1995

904 Millar/Dean Evo IX GSR 2006

962 Kennard/Grimwood Sti Spec C 2007

979 Wooster/Kulhanek 34GTR V-spec II N1 2001

The laughs and jokes will be put aside at the start of each stage as the crews get down to business.

While the GTRs of father and son crew, Manion/ Manion and newly formed crew of Wooster/ Kulhanek are fighting it out in the Outright Modern competition, the EVO 9 of Millar/ Dean and WRX of Kennard/ Grimwood will be racing for a place in the inaugural Showroom 4WD competition.

You can rest assured that either in competition, at the end of each day and on Sunday afternoon in Hobart, Team “Shake n Bake” will be having fun and enjoying the spirit of Targa Tasmania!

“Shake n Bake baby! Why? Because we like to SHAKE… then BAKE!!!!”

Yay! piss up sunday night it is then

Sounding like a plan :banana:

I sat in the car this morning to check I fit etc and now I'm officially excited.

Only 11 days before we leave for the boat!

So does Team Shake and Bake need a offical photographer for the event ?

Im heading down to cover the event, i think a team shoot on monday would look good ?

So does Team Shake and Bake need a offical photographer for the event ?

Im heading down to cover the event, i think a team shoot on monday would look good ?

Sounds awesome dude, ill see what the other guys think.. but its a bit of a no brainer!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...