Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have dynoed my GTT R34 (FULL STOCK), and have made 158 kw at rw... is this below, average or higher than most GTT R34's???

Also, i have no idea why but there is no 2nd stage boost for my GTT R34 and jumps straight up to full standard boost then drops down alittle bit... Is this normal??? Cuz my previous R33 GTS-T always had 2nd stage boost for stock...

158 is in the ball park. I'd say 145-155rwkw mark would be around what it would make.

Oh thats great to hear, so its not doing bad at all? But then again, like i said the 2nd stage boost has been eliminated and i don't know whether its solenoid wires has been earthed or anything but will this maybe increase the few kw up to 158?

Or do GTT R34 just doesn't have 2nd stage boost like the R33 at all?

not sure if i misread/misunderstood what you were saying but removing the 2nd stage boost so that it is always on the 2nd stage rather then sequential (low to high) will not increase power as you are always reaching the full stock 7psi at some point, on a dyno print out it would show the power delivery steeper, not taller

If thats not what your saying then disregard :thumbsup:

Edited by Baconer

Oh alright thanks manz, SkylinesAustralia is so much better than the previous forum i was always at (Skylinesowners.com) :thumbsup:

anywayz, wat the dyno graph shows is that my boost drops down 1 psi i think near by the end of rev with stock boost, so i don't understand wat the hecks going on as i thought it should stay at max stock boost 7 psi.

The boost seems to boost up to about 8 for some reason (FULL STOCK CAR), then drops down to about 7 or 6.7 psi near by the end of rev...And this is how the car made 158 kwrw... Does anyone know why the boost is higher than stock 7 psi for GTT R34??? and also does anyone know why the boost drops off when its not even boosted yet...

Later i used a turbotech manual boost controller and tried to control at 10 psi, then later it drops down to 7 psi... Would this mean the MBC is at fault? or my turbo is fooked??? ( BTW it made 164 kw@rw with boost controller)

Boost drops due to the stock solenoid. I wouldnt worry about it too much.

You really should start with a decent panel filter, exhaust and a ECU or S-AFC (or similar).

Then go looking for some extra boost.

Yeah im aware of that, but all i wanted to do is control the boost at 7-8...

My next step is to get all u said but i was thinking maybe i don't need the FMIC for GTT R34 as the intercooler can take up to 200kwrw... But the mechanic told me as it is summer now, it'll be safe to get a FMIC and then boost it up...So would my gtt intercooler be reliable for now with 10 psi boost and exhaust or should i just get a FMIC?

The stock GT-t cooler will be fine for 9-10psi. Plenty of people have made reasonable power with it.

Better off with the exhaust first, then a cooler later if you change turbos or something.

A massive cooler on a stock turbo and light boost will just make the car unresponsive.

The stock GT-t cooler will be fine for 9-10psi. Plenty of people have made reasonable power with it.

Better off with the exhaust first, then a cooler later if you change turbos or something.

A massive cooler on a stock turbo and light boost will just make the car unresponsive.

will 0.85 be too much of a boost for a stock GTT cooler to take during the australian summer coming if i trash it for the full boost to kick in lil often??? Whats the safest boost to set to 0.8 for summer with stock cooler? i don't wanna waste money on new cooler thats why....

10-11psi is the limit really anyhow.

Anymore and the turbo life is diminished, and will die eventually.

It'll be fine IMO if you give it a squirt here and there.

No turbo car should be 'flogged' to the high heavens in 40degree heat anyhow IMO.

The boost is dropping off due to the restrictive exhaust.

Mod in this order:

3" cat back exhaust.

High flow panel filter in stock airbox.

Proper 3" cat.

Turbo to cat. Bell mouth dump ok but split is better.

ECU upgrade of some sort, lots of possibilities out there, will probably need a boost controller at this stage too.

Etc

Etc

Keep going til your girfriend leaves.

you can also take 206kw at the engine and slowly do all those calculations you deduct from transmission loss and stuff to find rwkw.

Yes, but then again i keep getting different type of methods from different people to calculate it and it just doesn't work out. Somebody says to deduct 15% off the flywheel figure, which means 206kw becomes 170 kwrw which doesn't make sense.

Also because i had a R33 GTS-T previously and know R33 real WELL, by using this method of deducting 15% off 187kw flywheel becomes around 158kwrw which is ALSO IMPOSSIBLE as R33 is around 130-140 and lil over 140 if lucky.

Im also aware that R34 is 140-150 kwrw stock but i just wanted to make sure with the experts here. Im actually quite happy with the dyno i made of 158kwrw as its stock, but boost does drop off and its pretty bad when double d clutching as i use the dropped off boost instead of the higher boost in earlier rev range.

Currently after a tune yesterday my car sits at 184 rwkw on .75 Bar.

My mods so far are:

Splitfire coil packs

Walbro fuel pump

Drift pod filter

Blitz front mount

3 inch turbo back exhaust

Platinum spark plugs gapped to 0.8

AVCR boost controller

They could not put anymore boost into the car due to the standard computer pulling timing and dumping fuel at any higher boost level.

I have the next round of mods sitting at home now ready to go in which are:

Power FC

550cc Injectors

Z32 airflow meter

just ran out of money to fit this stuff at the moment

Currently after a tune yesterday my car sits at 184 rwkw on .75 Bar.

My mods so far are:

Splitfire coil packs

Walbro fuel pump

Drift pod filter

Blitz front mount

3 inch turbo back exhaust

Platinum spark plugs gapped to 0.8

AVCR boost controller

They could not put anymore boost into the car due to the standard computer pulling timing and dumping fuel at any higher boost level.

I have the next round of mods sitting at home now ready to go in which are:

Power FC

550cc Injectors

Z32 airflow meter

just ran out of money to fit this stuff at the moment

Is your car a manual or auto?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...