Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anybody listen to brekky on nova this morning

http://podcast.nova919.com.au/fjl080125b.mp3

this shit makes me wanna start a vigilante group, fly to the US and beat them with a trolley pole

i mean, ive been bought up to accept people as they are. Might not necessarily believe what they believe or like the things they do, but none the less everyone deserves respect. However these crackpots in this "church" (using the word VERY loosely, more rather replace it with another C word...namely "cult") that seem to think they can rid the world of gay people. And they seem to think that by having a big swipe at a dead celebrity (such as Heath Ledger) because he played the role of a gay man in a movie that he's gay.

anyone want to start an SAU vigilante group with me and fly to the deep south? LOL

anybody listen to brekky on nova this morning

http://podcast.nova919.com.au/fjl080125b.mp3

this shit makes me wanna start a vigilante group, fly to the US and beat them with a trolley pole

i mean, ive been bought up to accept people as they are. Might not necessarily believe what they believe or like the things they do, but none the less everyone deserves respect. However these crackpots in this "church" (using the word VERY loosely, more rather replace it with another C word...namely "cult") that seem to think they can rid the world of gay people. And they seem to think that by having a big swipe at a dead celebrity (such as Heath Ledger) because he played the role of a gay man in a movie that he's gay.

anyone want to start an SAU vigilante group with me and fly to the deep south? LOL

need a south park episode that takes the absolute piss outta them :) that'll sort em

i know a couple ppl that were brought up in a cult, and since ran away. getting a bit of insight into how they think n operate within cults is scary... most members are just sheep, who get scared into following. Its truly amazing how one or few ppl can have so much controll over so many ppl... a few well placed bullets could give a lot of people their lives back

I heard they announced how Heath Ledger died today,

it was alcohol poisoning

Apparently he had one too many cowboys :laughing-smiley-014:

What do Jake Gylennhal’s cherry and a bottle of Paxil have in common?

They both got popped by Heath Ledger.

Heath Ledger has apparently died of an overdose.

Rumour has it, He got addicted to ‘crack’ after shooting Brokeback Mountain!

Early reports stated that Heath was found dead in in Mary Kate Olsen’ apartment, it was suspected that he died of starvation.

I just heard on TMZ that Heath Ledger will be playing the role of Bernie in “Weekend at Bernie’s 3.

Batman: win by default

Edited by 4door_Sleeper

Lol, heard that before Guy, nice one though, even if it is a bit raw...

In other news, heard that some 100000 strong army of hackers have declared war against the "Church" of Scientology and have taken down their websites, phones and faxes. Made me laugh...

Link

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...