Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone in the hills area keen for a drive later? Kinda keen to go out for a run, been a while.

I was thinking about it there's an INFMS cruise on there way out to Lobethal at the moment i was thinking about catching up with them. What area are you in? I'm in Campbelltown.

wat size xd9 should i get??

18x9 +20 all round or F18x8 +35 or +28 R18x9 +20

i have no idea on offset!

18 x 9 +20 all round.

If you want to run 8s on the front you could go a lot lower offset, I've got 16 x 8 +0 on mine and they sit wicked.

*teh edits* I live 10 mins past Mt Barker, and I just got a call from my mate so I'm gonna head out in about half hour for a lil drive. If anyone wants to head my way and meet up somewhere nearish Barker could make a few car cruise out of it :laugh:

Edited by AndrewJZX100
they will sit on a 32 alright?

how much will they stick out?

Mine has hammered guards and ran a 225 on the back, sat mint as. The front has Nismo negative camber top arms so I've got a fair bit of clearance (ran 235s on the front with pretty much untouched guards and they only scraped on massive bumps when puching hard mid corner)

If you don't have camber arms, run a 17 on the front with a 215/45 and roll the guards properly and you shouldn't have any dramas. Will look fking hot too :laugh:

*edits* re-reading your question, they will stick out a bit. Rears will be sorta flush with camber, fronts ditto but if you don't have any camber on the front they'll be out by a few cm at least.

Edited by AndrewJZX100
yeh might go with the 18x9 +20 allround, maybe a +28 ish on the front to keep it in abit!

That's probably your best option, slighty higher front offset. For reference, this is a 17 x 9 +20 with a 225/45 and 3ish degrees of camber. Flush city :laugh:

s5003334rs1.jpg

Ok people keen on Meeting up to go to Mt barker SMS me where you live and your user name.

Dale

0439848276

Edit, and can you send me your number andrew?.

P.S. can a mod delete my number tomorrow, thanks

Edited by D_Stirls
He sounds like a real dick amanda

ha yeah it's amazing how fast some people change when they find out they got some1 pregnant.

i don't know why i bother with him though, trying to get things sorted out so were atleast on

better terms but yeah he's barely interested in doing that.

it's exhausting lol and i barely have any energy

ha yeah it's amazing how fast some people change when they find out they got some1 pregnant.

i don't know why i bother with him though, trying to get things sorted out so were atleast on

better terms but yeah he's barely interested in doing that.

it's exhausting lol and i barely have any energy

Its a fairly big thing for a bloke to be having a child. It freaks them out quite a bit especially if they are young. He will be up and down.

Maybe start taking another approach.

Take a step back, don't be angry, give him some space/time without harassment once he sees the baby his instinct should take over. Hopefully. :S

imo, he should be a man from the start and take his responsibility....whether theyre a couple or not, doesnt make a

difference, it is still his child!

i hate pricks like that.

yes you can't expect to wave your wang around and there'll be no consenquences!

sweet... looks nuts!

anyone got 18x9 +20 that i can test fit before habding over the cash??

cheers

You should PM the user 'ABU' about the offset and sizes he had on his GTS-t

I don't know offset but I think it was 18x9.5 and 18x10 with slightly pumped and rolled guards.

IMG_0048.jpg

IMG_0052.jpg

IMG_0056.jpg

xd9close.jpg

xd9side.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...