Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ben, how tuned can an n/a lancer be?

where you being sarcastic? cos im confused!

higher octane will boost even an NA engine :domokun: true... dont hate on NA, they have pretty good fuel economy compared to us turbo lads lol

wasnt being sarcastic, just wanted to point out that running better fuel could mean that the guy just likes to feed his engine the best stuff he can. nothing wrong with that

-D

So GTRS's on a RB26/30 good idea or will i lose too much top end power?

I think you meant it the other way around Luke

do u want dyno figures or do you want a car that is nice to drive

If I recall correctly (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) RS has more peak than the SS, the SS has more response..

Can someone in the know pls clarify?

The Garrett 2860 series are worth a look, whether u go -5 -7 or -9... depends what ur after mane :domokun:

-D

yeah it really depends what Luke is trying to get out of his car...........sure the SS maybe more responsive on a 26 than the RS but then again 2x RS would be more responsive than a big single on a 26.

A 30 on the other hand would love bigger turbos hence why Supras respond better to bigger turbos than an RB.

I think he could make the 2x RS work on his RB if he played with the cams' overlap via adjustable gears or different cams.

yeah ment the other way around woops.

Gonna start looking for a 30 bottom end soon and get that sorted out.

So are you looking at running twin GTRS?

First of all i wouldn't buy a GTRS as the Garrett 52T GT2871R is 100% the same turbo, with the exception of HKS being cast on the compressor housing (even then they are all built by Garrett), and the GT2871R will be half the price.

If you go for a GT2871R instead of a GTRS you also have the option of 3 trims the 48,52 and 56 trim; I would suggest going for the 48 trim as you will find anything larger very laggy.

On my CA the 52T being driven by 1.8 litres I see 1 BAR at around 4000 RPM with adjustable gears set up for max response, so if you have 1.5 litres driving them you won't be seeing a BAR until around 4700+RPM but then they will hit like a train.

Even with a set of 48T's you will be getting full boost around 4500+BAR but you have to remember that a pair of 48T's are rated to 800BHP and two 52T's are rated to 920BHP.

So are you looking at running twin GTRS?

First of all i wouldn't buy a GTRS as the Garrett 52T GT2871R is 100% the same turbo, with the exception of HKS being cast on the compressor housing (even then they are all built by Garrett), and the GT2871R will be half the price.

If you go for a GT2871R instead of a GTRS you also have the option of 3 trims the 48,52 and 56 trim; I would suggest going for the 48 trim as you will find anything larger very laggy.

On my CA the 52T being driven by 1.8 litres I see 1 BAR at around 4000 RPM with adjustable gears set up for max response, so if you have 1.5 litres driving them you won't be seeing a BAR until around 4700+RPM but then they will hit like a train.

Even with a set of 48T's you will be getting full boost around 4500+BAR but you have to remember that a pair of 48T's are rated to 800BHP and two 52T's are rated to 920BHP.

agree whole heartedly with that.

yeah Luke the GTRS's have a 52 Trim...............also the same specs but cheaper are the 2860 -10

on a 30 they would be fine if you pull some overlap out of your cams

If on the other hand you were only after response, then stick with -5's or even smaller SS's...........they wont give you the power that the above will and I know that's what you're after.

check it:

Turbo_Comparison.jpg

oooooh it is so quiet in here in the middle of the night ....

Well, now I have a quandry. I have just finished typing up yesterdays mammoth days worth of valuation reports and need to decide whether I should bother going to bed or not.

I have to be up at 8am, as Munro is coming to pick me up in the 'OS Giken 3 Litre Streeter' for a burn/cruise down to Victor Harbour for lunch and some cruising/photos.

Plus, there is every chance my 1 year old will wake up at 6am and come wake me up then anyhow.

So, would I feel better later today if I had 1) a quick 1.25 hour nap, 2) a 3.25 hour kip, or 3) just stay up and do more work (I have plenty more work I can do).

Hmmmmm decisions, decisions .... anyone else up at this crazy hour to give me advice?

Hmmmmm decisions, decisions .... anyone else up at this crazy hour to give me advice?

no.

but i do however have something to say about this;

I have to be up at 8am, as Munro is coming to pick me up in the 'OS Giken 3 Litre Streeter' for a burn/cruise down to Victor Harbour for lunch and some cruising/photos.

i hate you. i hate you. i hate you. i hate you. i hate you. i hate you. i hate you.

i hate you.

:(

hehehe .... even I hate me too sometimes :) .... we were going to ask Keir to bring down the R35GTR for a burn as well, but he has to work ;)

You would hate me more if we were bringing the R35 methinks :(

fyi I have decided to stay up .... watching the sunrise at the moment.

Bizarrely I have nearly run out of work things to do - I never thought it would happen! Of course I have phone calls to make - but I don't think everyone would share our zest for this early morning if I rang them now.

Are you getting up for work, or returning home from work Dave?

i would of said a 90 min power nap is good i heard on the radio sleep waves hit in 90 min intervals and what do they say when driving rest revive survive then they have a sign saying sleep for 15min :(

i know when i come home dog tired and fall asleep in front of the TV before dinner when i wake up im heaps better

hehehe .... even I hate me too sometimes :) .... we were going to ask Keir to bring down the R35GTR for a burn as well, but he has to work ;)

You would hate me more if we were bringing the R35 methinks :(

i hate you. i hate you. i hate you.

... hook a brother up?

Are you getting up for work, or returning home from work Dave?

neither. its technically my day off... i think... until 5pm when i need to get up for work. so im sitting here watching top gear and pondering a suitable time to get some kip so i dont resemble death warmed up when i get up to decide whether or not ill actually bother with going to work.

I hooked up half my HID kit last night :( Just need to mount the ballast and extend the earth wire, then put the other in! Looks good, if anyone wants i can take a pic of standard halogen vs 6000k HID at night time.

yeah too true about power naps.

when I used to travel alot for work I found that if I pulled over for a 30 minute kip I was right for the rest of the journey......nothing more freaky than opening up your eyes on the wrong side of the road to find a bee double coming at you with air horns and spotties blazing :(

well i take my car next week to lewis engines after doing the rings on mine i am getting a 25/30 combo not certain on turbo choice yet ill talk to darren next thursday when i make the trip down there

was going to get 26/30 combo but even more $$$

also getting a ppg gearbox custom fuel system etc gearbox little pricey but dam they are good any one had any experience with the race logic traction control system i feel like getting one because of traction issues ill have.

back onto turbo i was thinking about a to4z then but i dont want a lazy puts but rev and launch it is a different story maybe gt series might suit.?

anyway once shes finished getting built ill be able to bring her out on a cruise maybe so im all excited .

just have to wait now :rofl:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...