Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

coppers gave me a lift home yeehh haaaa but they didn't want to do the whole fogell Mc lovin thing, got to say nye wasnt that spesg might have to go up to queensland next year to seemy bro and his mates, oww i did set of some fireworks which was pretty cool, you know the ones im talking bout think there called sparklers.lol

HI everyone!

Havent posted in aaaages, been so bloody busy with work. Retail at this time of the year is so flat out but good thing is I should be getting a bloody good pay next week! Oh and yay for 4 days off :action-smiley-069:

Is there anyone on here that has knowledge on the stock markets or knows someone who does?

I'm looking into investing into 3 different places and need to speak with someone as I'm only going off what I've seen happen in the market and I'm really just making a guess but I will be looking into investing maybe over 10k so I dont want it to be a stupid one :D.

I know there are some people on here that have invested so I wouldn't mind talking to them either!

Thanks people!

Edited by Import S13
Well if anyone wants a movie to see I HIGHLY recommend Defiance with Daniel Craig. Awesome film, great story and plenty of edge of the seat scenes. I don't usually like him but he was great in this one, definately a must see of 2009. Not sure of the release date here in Australia but when it lands, take my work and give it a chance!

its not often you see the words Awesome film and Daniel Craig in the same sentence... hehe...

its not often you see the words Awesome film and Daniel Craig in the same sentence... hehe...

Thats a bit harsh. I thought he did a brilliant job in casino royale..

Saw Tropic thunder, Wall St, Wall-E and 300 over the last few days. All good flicks... tropic thunder is hilarious, 300 is epic, wall st is insightful and wall-e is just damn cute

"Just because it's a theme song don't make it not true..."

-D

Is there anyone on here that has knowledge on the stock markets or knows someone who does?

under the theory of an informed market all investors are assumed to have full knowlege and understanding of the company and therefore the price will accurately reflect the risks and rewards that investing in that company. in lamans terms people know sh*t about the company they invest in it till the price is just about right unless theres some insider trading or fraudelant activitys going on behind the scenes the price should be just about right. if its a usa comp and its not a crazy big company people may be waiting to see what there financial reports will say whenever there posted(i forget what date usa and others gota do em) and look for a bit of change in stock price around then. all advice to buy and sell is based on what the financial reports say which are about as accurate as saying yeah man my cars super fast therefore its faster than fast cars, you cant compare usa companys with those around the world because each has diff accounting standards(its getting better with IASB's but they still have differences) some companys will adjust those figures also (my old boss used to say tell me how much profit you want to make and ill make the reports say that, depending on what they want to acheive suprisingly they want people to invest in the company and records can be adjusted to encourage that. a company called enron springs to mind on paper they were doing extremely well till they filled for bankruptcy.

and in summary of the above chat to me about it next you catch me on here stock market is a risky place my friend are you sure your prepared to lose that kinda $ and if you tell me that cash is from your car loan ill kick your ass

^^

tropic thunder was a bit average i thought had some moments but yeah i wouldnt say great, call me a wet blanket

uggh damnations

4.5 weeks later and no stagea still.

going to be a while i guess; unless the head was given back to the builder (faulty n0.6 stem seal)

so want it back. was anxious for a while (side effect of the Durogesic fentyanl pain patches) but ok now.

man, the sweats. major fricken sweats with the patch. yuko

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...