Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so, turbo people, looking at getting a new turbo for the s14, as the stocker is one its way out. not thinking anything massive, got it down to a garrett GT28R or GT28RS, just wondering if anyone here has any experience with them? ill probably end up browsing the forced induction forum soon, just seeing if theres anyone here whos used either first.
cheers krish, completely forgot about dale. shall have to have a chat with him. 34 turbo sounds interesting, thinking lag could be an issue with the missing 500cc though. just looking for nice streetable power, somewhere around the 150-160rwkw mark.

Hey Dave,

If there is nothing wrong with your turbo then I would keep it fit a boost controller and go see Jeff (SpeedLab) for a remap. For around $500-$700 (my remap was around at or below the lower end of that scale but SR's need a daughter board installed which the CA's don't and the board costs around $250 by itself) your current turbo you will make around the 190rwkw mark. I have a feeling that you will be near the limit of your AFM at that point and you won't want to go to much further with your standard injectors, but you should get there.

If you want to go bigger turbo then you will be looking at at least 550cc injectors (but 740cc are the same price and they will give you more scope for improvements in the future improvements) remember that with 4 cylinders you have to go bigger with your injectors to make the same power as a 6 as there are less of them.

You will also need to a bigger AFM; once again you have choices a Z32 will support around the 320-350rwkw mark but costs anywhere from $200-$300 where as a SII RB25 AFM will support 230-240rwkw and will cost you around $50, and really even if you go for a GT2860RS you won't be making 230kw without cams.

If your still after up upgrade i would suggest the GT2860RS as a GT28R (A.K.A T28BB) is only ever so slighlty bigger than what you have on there from the factory

I would forget about the GT2871R as it's too big for what you are looking for as it will support 230-240kw without cams and 250-260kw with cams but come at the cost of response (full boost at around 3700-4000 depending on cam setup).

Anything else just ask

Edited by D_Stirls
sorry im agreeing with the doh man, sounded like a steam train trying to take off at first and also like it stalled about 6times. crommies also terrible.

if you gonna go v8 go for elenor or gt40 :)

you guy's do realise that it's supercharged as well and that is why the idle is up and down like that.

P.S. i think it sounds absolutely TOUGH, but then i did grow up around BIG V8s.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJNM3sHcwBY...re=channel_page

See the front mount at 0.24

Edited by D_Stirls
meh i dont care if its got 2000hp it sounds terrible to me,

but ive always been a exotic loving anti v8 type of person :)

although i have developed soft spots for the 2 above v8 mentioned cars and shelby cobra's

I have a soft spot for 1967-1969 chevy camaro's... 1st series... even today they look frigging awesome...

-D

meh i dont care if its got 2000hp it sounds terrible to me,

but ive always been a exotic loving anti v8 type of person :)

although i have developed soft spots for the 2 above v8 mentioned cars and shelby cobra's

Well you'd hate this thing then cos' it has a dirty old V8 in it ;)

lol now that sounds tuff, has tt attached much like f40s which are also tuff :)

i just dont really like the valliant style box cars pencil ruler design and engines that sound like they stalling or have metal getting chewed up inside.

but thats me feel free to disagree ya'll ;) i drive a rusty dato anyway

Edited by Inline 6
anyone want stickers made up for their cars that have reflective properties? ie the stuff road signs are made from?

like so: 006.jpg

ill take a barracuda. in red.

Hey Dave,

If there is nothing wrong with your turbo then I would keep it fit a boost controller and go see Jeff (SpeedLab) for a remap. For around $500-$700 (my remap was around at or below the lower end of that scale but SR's need a daughter board installed which the CA's don't and the board costs around $250 by itself) your current turbo you will make around the 190rwkw mark. I have a feeling that you will be near the limit of your AFM at that point and you won't want to go to much further with your standard injectors, but you should get there.

If you want to go bigger turbo then you will be looking at at least 550cc injectors (but 740cc are the same price and they will give you more scope for improvements in the future improvements) remember that with 4 cylinders you have to go bigger with your injectors to make the same power as a 6 as there are less of them.

You will also need to a bigger AFM; once again you have choices a Z32 will support around the 320-350rwkw mark but costs anywhere from $200-$300 where as a SII RB25 AFM will support 230-240rwkw and will cost you around $50, and really even if you go for a GT2860RS you won't be making 230kw without cams.

If your still after up upgrade i would suggest the GT2860RS as a GT28R (A.K.A T28BB) is only ever so slighlty bigger than what you have on there from the factory

I would forget about the GT2871R as it's too big for what you are looking for as it will support 230-240kw without cams and 250-260kw with cams but come at the cost of response (full boost at around 3700-4000 depending on cam setup).

Anything else just ask

thanks for the advice mate. :)

fairly sure somethings not right with the current turbo, but ill wait til i pull it off the engine and have a good look at it. might just get it rebuilt and tuned.

cheers.

All this talking about ECU remapping has got me curious.

So, it's basically flashing the ECU? Everything on the outside/inside of the ECU is kept standard (eg. no chips soldered to it, etc) except the ROM data?

Would this mean, it's technically a way to get through Regency as opposed to having a Power FC or something else as your ECU?

All this talking about ECU remapping has got me curious.

So, it's basically flashing the ECU? Everything on the outside/inside of the ECU is kept standard (eg. no chips soldered to it, etc) except the ROM data?

Would this mean, it's technically a way to get through Regency as opposed to having a Power FC or something else as your ECU?

Yes and no... you can reflash an ECU with another set of firmware which may or may not contain an updated map...

The map is EEPROM which stores a spreadsheet of air fuel ratios and other assorted timings, and is done by using a laptop in most cases, and can sometimes be done without any mods... r32 gtr ecu is reprogrammable but the 33 and 34's arent iirc. Thats one of the reasons people like to switch to aftermarket ecu's like PFC's because of the ability to change heaps of settings..

-D

and, lets face it, chicks dig live readouts on the pfc hand controller.

i dont haz pfc, oldschool gameboy with LAN cord going from gameboy to behind the dash will have to do till the funds allow :P

scandy, 3 spoke rims are made of fail............ IMHO

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...