Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

And my Optus bill saga lives on!

Here's the bill in question:

06 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 561 KB $0.25

07 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 55 KB $0.02

08 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 8504 KB $3.78

09 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 5 KB $0.00

13 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 9204 KB $4.07

14 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 353 KB $0.14

15 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 45127 KB $612.75

16 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 7392 KB $100.81

18 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 39632 KB $17.57

19 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 23277 KB $10.31

20 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 34668 KB $15.37

21 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 3655 KB $1.62

22 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 156 KB $0.06

23 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 39736 KB $17.63

24 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 96072 KB $42.64

25 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 44736 KB $19.85

26 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 7833 KB $3.47

27 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 3786 KB $1.67

28 Feb yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 14452 KB $6.41

01 Mar yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 35405 KB $15.70

02 Mar yes$79 Cap+Unlimited Text 19967 KB $8.86

Total volume: 424 MB $882.98

See that in bold? I've been charged at some magical rate for only those 2 days compared to the rest! And when I say magical, I mean... stupid.

Called today, got through to a Aussie (hooray) but... got told "those charges must be legit!" YET he couldn't even tell me at what rate/why I've been charged extreme amounts for those 2 days! It was normal internet usage just like all the other days - not in roaming, etc.

Everything else EXCEPT those 2 days has been rolled into my data caps.

Now it's been raised with the Billing Investigations Team. Sounds fancy but lets hope they know how to do their job.

Edit: and yeah, blah blah blah this is a car forum... but we're all family here.

Edited by CRoNic...
id be quite happy for him to defend the looked after CA's, after all, he has a mean one that would eat alot of RB25's.

and a highly modified RB25 will eat alot of RB26 and a highly modified RB26 will eat alot of Ferraris....

Sorry, I'm always skeptical of things like this. There are no details on it, and it could be anyone's.

Got a print out detailing your car?

That's alright the people that need to know, know the validity. There are no details about my car anywhere online. There is a build thread on NS but it hasn't got any plate/VIN numbers on it and that is the way it'll be staying. Besides the details in the box that I have edited out are entered when you put the car on the dyno anyway so they shouldn't be taken as gospel anyway.

Edited by D_Stirls
and a highly modified RB25 will eat alot of RB26 and a highly modified RB26 will eat alot of Ferraris....

And so on and so forth ...

I see, and agree with, your point. :)

yeah your right vu, but for the sake of defending the CA, im saying that they aren't shit engines, the guy behind the wheel over their 18 year life makes them a shit engine, combined with not changing fluids every 5000-10000k's for the last *at least* 5 years.

yeah your right vu, but for the sake of defending the CA, im saying that they aren't shit engines, the guy behind the wheel over their 18 year life makes them a shit engine, combined with not changing fluids every 5000-10000k's for the last *at least* 5 years.

Hear Hear :)

And here's some more proof;

innan%20vm.jpg

705whp.jpg

I dont mind CAs.

BUT. think about howmuch you have to spend just to get it up to RB25s power levels. Also how much you are pushing the engine,

Add as much as you want. IMO id rather a RB thats pushing good power without massive mods.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...le-t260355.html

Rims have ruined a half-decent GTR...

But that's WAY to cheap... apart from the body work, I'd dare say the engine is in need of some repair...

my money is on a shagged motor, that thing was for sale by its last owner around a month or so ago, now its back up again so soon.... and atleast 5k cheaper.... seems fishy

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...le-t260355.html

Rims have ruined a half-decent GTR...

But that's WAY to cheap... apart from the body work, I'd dare say the engine is in need of some repair...

Hell for that price, you'd have a few coin left over to fix up the engine.

I agree the rims are ;)

Buyer beware :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...