Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

doh comment :)

i always thought it was amusing that alcohol and cigarettes accounted for a substantially larger ratio of deaths than every other drug in existance COMBINED

it could however be argued a crap load more people drink booze and smoke cigy's therefore you would expect more deaths in relation to it. but i have a dislike for illegal drugs so call me biast :)

and i stay the f away from coffee :P i know ppl that went into shakes on a regular basis when they tried giving it up. i have however fell victim to lunch time coke hits. its O K there's no sugar. o that was coke zero btw :P

and i see more talk of the kat tat chick bone or no bone. we had that discussion, it was established half of sau want aids :D

Edited by Inline 6
thats sooooo not kat von d... as if you call yourself a fan krishy!!! or do all us white people look the same to you? =P

good steals scandy!

i had to lol

doh comment :)

i always thought it was amusing that alcohol and cigarettes accounted for a substantially larger ratio of deaths than every other drug in existance COMBINED

it could however be argued a crap load more people drink booze and smoke cigy's therefore you would expect more deaths in relation to it. but i have a dislike for illegal drugs so call me biast :)

and i stay the f away from coffee :P i know ppl that went into shakes on a regular basis when they tried giving it up. i have however fell victim to lunch time coke hits. its O K there's no sugar. o that was coke zero btw :P

and i see more talk of the kat tat chick bone or no bone. we had that discussion, it was established half of sau want aids :D

um you realise coffee is in coke can you say denial

thats sooooo not kat von d... as if you call yourself a fan krishy!!! or do all us white people look the same to you? =P

good steals scandy!

spot on luke hahaha i am a fan of Ms von D so leave me alone

Some say that the artificial sweetners will cause cancer faster than cigarettes will......!

And mobile phones give you head tumors and everyone must take fish oil everyday.... etc etc. We are all gonna die at some stage, if we all lived the perfect lives we would eat 2 fruit and 5 veg every day, be on more multivitamins than you can swallow at once and avoid all luxuries in life because they increase your chance of testicular malfunction or your skeleton jumping out of your skin. f**k it, live life!

And mobile phones give you head tumors and everyone must take fish oil everyday.... etc etc. We are all gonna die at some stage, if we all lived the perfect lives we would eat 2 fruit and 5 veg every day, be on more multivitamins than you can swallow at once and avoid all luxuries in life because they increase your chance of testicular malfunction or your skeleton jumping out of your skin. f**k it, live life!

Err.... I think you might have taken my post a tad too serious......

Lol not having a go at you Talbs, more a go at the reports on the news of everyday objects increasing your risk of death. Off on a tangent :)

LOL! I know..... I don't like any of those diet/artificial sweetner drinks myself and I don't think there is anything conclusive to say it causes cancer other than in lab rats :P

You're more likely to walk across the road and get cleaned up by a hoon driving a skyline..... :)

LOL! I know..... I don't like any of those diet/artificial sweetner drinks myself and I don't think there is anything conclusive to say it causes cancer other than in lab rats :)

You're more likely to walk across the road and get cleaned up by a hoon driving a skyline..... :)

Speaking of cleaned up, I nearly hit some f**khead on a bike today. Was driving my brothers vitara and was in a slip lane to do a right hand turn into a sidestreet. Was on northeast road and the traffic was backed up and the two lanes of cars had stopped to allow room for the turn across the traffic. Anyhow, I'm turning in and this the sphincter of the universe flies past at around 50-60 and screams obscenities at me while I tap the brakes just enough to miss him, as he flies past. You'd think that cyclists exercise a little bit more caution, considering the bike lane is completely blind when the traffic is banked up (and the fact that the traffic was banked up for a good couple KM and the sensible drivers had left room for people to turn...

Is it just me, or are all cyclists total wankers?

-D

Is it just me, or are all cyclists total wankers?

-D

Certainly can be.... I'm all for sharing the road, but when these morons ride 2+ abreast and block lanes they're just asking for abuse or even worse..... Funnily enough I too almost cleaned up a cyclist this morning go across the Salisbury Hwy intersection from Commercial Rd.... flamin mongrel was riding pretty much in the middle of the road where 2 lanes merge..... wtf :)

Certainly can be.... I'm all for sharing the road, but when these morons ride 2+ abreast and block lanes they're just asking for abuse or even worse..... Funnily enough I too almost cleaned up a cyclist this morning go across the Salisbury Hwy intersection from Commercial Rd.... flamin mongrel was riding pretty much in the middle of the road where 2 lanes merge..... wtf :P

Transport SA pretty much vindicates both of us in this scenario :

Bicycles are classified as vehicles and therefore bicycle riders have the same responsibilities and must obey the same rules as motor vehicle drivers. Remember:You can be charged with a traffic offence in the same way as a motor vehicle driver. This includes incurring demerit points against your Driver's Licence if you hold one. You incur demerit points even if you don’t hold a Driver’s Licence (which can prohibit you from obtaining one). Although the law gives you the same rights and responsibilities as other road users, all road users may not be aware of this. You are more easily injured than motor vehicle occupants are and it is therefore safer for you to be highly visible and look out for other road users when riding. The law does not give anyone indisputable right of way. Do not assume that another road user is going to give way Some people will judge all bicycle riders by your actions. If you disregard the road rules, you can undermine the goodwill of other road users.

:)

-D

Edited by Dohmar
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...