Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah Dan, not just any RB30, but OS Giken RB30 .... just the blocks alone are $30k .... and he has bought many of them .... still has a brand new one sitting under his workbench under a sheet if I remember correctly ....

and given all that coin RIPS are making the same power and pulling 10,000rpm on a dirty old VL 3 litre block that cost $100. :/

Infact give RIPS NZ$19,500 (less 20% for exchange rate) and they'll give you a 1100+HP ready completely engine.

http://www.ripsltd.com/products.html

Geoff2.jpg

Edited by D_Stirls
adding to that an OS Giken quad plate clutch at around 4-5k, an OS gearset at around $6-7k, then you got a bottom end, clutch and gearbox, around 50k later, haha.

I got my OS gearset for 5k new

what do yas think about the Ogura Racing Clutch's yet to use mine heard good feedback but

what is everyone's thought on these if you have used them b4.?

i have an orc twin plate, and i love it. had an unknown brand heavy duty clutch in the old girl when i got it. the orc has ass loads of clamping force, the friction point feels really exact and its not too hard to drive with (my gf drives it easily, and to my knowledge only stalled it on the first 2 attempts to get off the line)

and given all that coin RIPS are making the same power and pulling 10,000rpm on a dirty old VL 3 litre block that cost $100. :(

Infact give RIPS NZ$19,500 (less 20% for exchange rate) and they'll give you a 1100+HP ready completely engine.

[sexy image]PORN[/sexy image]

what a sexy bit of kit that is!

hey kye, wait a few months and buy the 200.

hey mate, my friends just bought a car today. a car that a guy said was sold came back up and he snapped it up.

sorry man

damn sell out

ill give ya 5 for it, need something to drive to work :)

you can give me 5 and the gtr and maybe a blowie and only then ill consider letting you take it :)

Buy Jon's VR4 Kye!

he would never sell it and id never buy it so he keeps it forever :(

nah just picked it up before but its just a gun metal grey r33 coup

got it pretty cheap at 9.7k. has a really thick cooler, short shiter, gauges, full exhaust, impuls, heavy clutch, stealth wing and a few other things.

really really clean though!

lol. lot less than he woulda got the 200 for. :(

sounds like a decent buy.

yeah not to bad, picked me up before to get food and i got to drive it.

sounds pretty tuff and has alittle bit of balls i guess :)

FFS, anyone know wtf is going on with the fs section on ns :)

was working for me before both cars and parts

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...