Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

from 120 thru to 180 the downward line shows that it was dropping from 14.7psi down to 12psi at WOT in top gear

That's the torque curve not boost; and torque will almost always drop off in the top end as you have past the point of Max' VE (volumetric Efficiency) and rate of change of power has began to decrease i.e.torque.

Here's an example; these two print outs are of the same runs; one showing torque and the other showing boost. See how the boost is dead flat but the torque is still dropping.

CamAdjustmentsCA18detGT2871RTorqueM.jpg

CamAdjustmentsCA18detGT2871RBoostM.jpg

Edited by D_Stirls
Thats sweet Craig. and by "drove a VT Commodore" i hope you mean "watched you have sex with Megan Fox"

hahah strange night indeed. One of those only half sleeping nights. Had the laptop next to me waiting for downloads to fin all night. Hence weird dreams.

I only really remember you being in my front yard. drinking. then kicking the wheel of your commodore with your foot.

I woke up today and thought to myself 'wtf'

i can't see how unless they are rated higher. First i would look at whether the factory solenoid is still in line if it is then bypass it and it MAY help a bit. But the others are right a EBC is your best bet as they minimise wastegate creep and do a much better job at controlling boost.

If you twist my arm i might even sell you my new one that has only done 500km since i'm looking and changing to a Turbosmart E-Boost 2.

P.S> so is your car Auto or Manual?

Its a Blitz DSBC Spec S.

BLITZDualSBCspecS.jpg

That power is low then since your car is a manual.

you should be pulling a lot better numbers than that graph of my mates, because the only mods done to it were; Full 3 inch exhaust and FMIC, that's it. Doesn't even have a boost controller, Hence the boost curve . So it's running standard factory fuel and ignition maps it's just with the freed up exhaust and intercooler they run up to 12psi.

So even on 10.5 psi you should be closer to 200kw than you are.

Edited by D_Stirls

yeah stirls, I know its a torque curve, ... being my car and all the tunes etc I just happen to know at that point of time with that tune the boost dropped off as described

alls good now tho

:D

the only mods done to it were; Full 3 inch exhaust and FMIC, that's it. Doesn't even have a boost controller, Hence the boost curve . So it's running standard factory fuel and ignition maps it's just with the freed up exhaust and intercooler they run up to 12psi.

So if I were to put a FMIC on my car which is stock except for the 3" turbo back, I could go to 10 psi without any other supporting mods?

So if I were to put a FMIC on my car which is stock except for the 3" turbo back, I could go to 10 psi without any other supporting mods?

with his car that is what we found, though every car is different and if you have a look at the graph it's a far from ideal boost curve.

Also before you go out and start flogging around with your new found power is't probably a good idea it chuck it on the dyno and run it up to see if the AFR's are acceptable in your case. Nissans are generally VERY rich under boost though.

Edited by D_Stirls

I'm not interested in huge power figures and 'flogging' it but just want a little more acceleration. At the moment it hits the factory 5psi by around 3K RPM since the AM split dump and Cat have gone on, just want a gentle extra shove so to speak. I haven't done the hi boost mode mod to the car yet either.

FMIC, full 3" exhaust, I'd put 12psi through a RB25 anyday providing your injectors and fuel pump are in good enough to keep up which unless you have a good ear for pinging even sometimes you can't hear it I would do it all on a dyno so you can watch A/F ratos through out rev range and accurate manifold pressures (boost pressure).

FMIC, full 3" exhaust, I'd put 12psi through a RB25 anyday providing your injectors and fuel pump are in good enough to keep up which unless you have a good ear for pinging even sometimes you can't hear it I would do it all on a dyno so you can watch A/F ratos through out rev range and accurate manifold pressures (boost pressure).

Yeah, i only tuned it to 10.5psi to increase the life of the turbo. 12psi is at peak efficiency for a stock rb25 turbo.

Okay you know how sometimes you see car accidents and you think... how??

Well this afternoon, there was an accident in my suburb, which resulted in a Commodore suffering rear end damage next to a bent power pole. Sounds straightforward huh? But there was a car trailer with a car on it, upside down behind the Commodore - as in right behind - but the Commodore was on 4 wheels. Hope everyone was ok.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
×
×
  • Create New...