Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did you not say a RB25 hybrid? Or is that the type of turbo, a hybrid of a RB25 turbo, not the engine.

I am putting a 3076R on a stock RB25...but it will have 740cc injectors, and a kickass ECU. Just a matter of booking the car in, and handing over about $1.5k to have it installed and tuned :P

The difference in response between the 3071 and the 2871 would be less then 200rpm but will give you more headroom for future mods. Infact Powertune in NSW and Street Forced Performance in Vic have developed a 3071 kits for SR's that are as responsive as a 2871r if not more responsive. I'll find the thread;

EDIT!! Here you go

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=406078

Edited by D_Stirls
Took some pics of the new toy yesterday .... pity it was raining and filthed it up before the photos (despite it being washed 2 hours earlier :P )

Fave photo

I was outside in the rain, rinsing my car off, so once the rain stopped i didn't have any dusty watermarks, the joys of living off a dirt road.

random "update" of my "progress". just copied and pasted from my ns thread cause im lazy.

i decided id stop being lazy and start fitting my oil cooler today.

i also decided id go with a relo instead of just using a sandwich plate. having trouble picking a spot to mount the relo though, so if anyone has any suggestions, that be great.

a view that is becoming all too common with this car...

IMG_2579.jpg

new billet alloy earls relo block;

IMG_2575.jpg

roughly where the core will sit;

IMG_2571.jpg

and where the lines will be routed;

IMG_2576.jpg

the mess of fittings off the permacool spin on adaptor;

IMG_2573.jpg

(that bung in the straight fitting is a port for the temp gauge, blocked up til i get it...)

almost finished, need to mount the relo block, buy a filter, buy 1x 90 barb fitting, 1x 45 degree barb fitting, some straps of aluminium to mount the core, and itll be done.

so the kit now consists of a permacool spin on block adaptor, an earls billet relo block, an earls 19 row cooler, a whole bunch of random fittings, and 3 metres of flame proof line. bit more than i started with. lol.

and a random lol;

tumblr_kq4cd8cwqe1qa3i8uo1_500.jpg

Edited by scandyflick
im totally bringing my gameboy out of retirement for pokemon!! WOOOT

lol I cranked out the N64 for Zelda the other day. Still got my SuperNes aswell including all the classics like super Mario world, donkey kong 1, 2, & 3, yoshis island, plus many more.

if you get modded xbox the old 1 anyways u can get any nes, super nes, ds and some n64 games on it.

works much better than using keyboard on pc ;)

and there are these things called emulators that prob work better than your webpage for it.

mario allstars ftw

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...