Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am getting an alarm installed with twin immobiliser for my r33 skyline. The installer seems to think he cannont install the alarm/immobiliser with the turbo timer. Has anyone done this themselves? or know how to do it? Please advise me on this so i might be able to advise them.

He said it had to do with the alarm and australian standards.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18849-alarm-with-turbo-timer/
Share on other sites

I have a HKS type 1 turbo timer with my alarm/immobiliser and they work fine together. I didn't do the wiring myself but I know it has been done via a relay, so when you turn the key off the alarm recognise that and the engine keep running off the turbo timer. There are no security issues because you are not bypassing anything just separating the two devices with the relay.

I have heard that some alarms either have provision for a timer, or inbuilt timers. If not it can be done via a relay as mine has been done.

Sorry I can't tell you exactly how the wiring is done, as I got it done by the guy who did my stereo install. I had been told by a few people that it couldn't be done also till I came across this guy. He just said alot of guys aren't aware how its done because it isn't that common, and that most guys that do these installs aren't true auto electricans.

Dunno how much truth there is in that, all I know is that mine now works and I can't fault any of the work he did. It is all quality, tidy work.

firstly, you cannot have the feature whereby the doors unlock when the engine dies

secondly, you need a bypass chip that allows u to look your car and immobilise after the engine dies. the chip cost me 38 bucks to add on to my pre-existing alarm.

send it to the shop that fitted your alarm and if the seem incompetent, send to another agent that does the same type of alarms :) hope that helps

firstly, you cannot have the feature whereby the doors unlock when the engine dies

yes this is true however you can have it so when you turn the key and pull it out the doors unlock then the turbo timer counts down. then you get out and lock the car via remote and the alarm arms. well thats my car anyways. oh and when you turn the car on both doors automatically lock.. pretty cool.

also when my car is being run via the turbo timer and you lower the handbrake it cuts out

as long as the immoboliser is not wiered to the fuel pomp the car will still run upn till the timer shuts down most ov the time thay cill the egnishon so theat u cant start it and when the hand brake is let down the car will stall and u cant start it with out the remote the key less entery shoud b abell to lock the car and armit if this is dun

this is what mine does.

i start boosting warhhhhh pshhhh pshhh ect you get the idear.

see some hot chicks, pull over.

decide im so cool that i turn off my ignition.

my blitz turbo timer kicks in, set for 1min or there abouts.

if i dont lock my car the imobiliser automaticlly sets after 30secconds.

if i lock the car the imobiliser is armed and the car is locked.

if i was to be in the car and locked myself in (which i tried) and put the key back in and try start it, the car turns off alarm sirens.

then my cars all locked, i go talk to da hot chix.

and all is cool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...