Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was looking at 100mm cores...as i want to throw the twin set up and got a single set up, and how i was seeing this is at say the same boost level the big single is sure to be pushing more air than the twins. am i correct? so the larger core wont be too bad

ill tell ya now i bought a big fat 120mm cooler and it is the worst thing i ever done as it was nasty very nasty 2 fit,front reo had major surgery...if i was smarter i would have done what you did and asked people...

how does a 100-105mm core fit on the r32 GTR front like? is there much modifying the front bar and reo...not concerned about the reo bar as it needs either to be replaced or to have a bit of time spent on it. thats story for another time...just a stupid mistake someone made that had the car b4 me

i have a 90mm ARE custom job, and the reo and part of the front bar was cut. spoke to ARE and they recommended this tube and fin, will happily keep temps down at track to around 450rwkw. it's a bit overkill but if the motor pops and I build an engine, I won't have to upgrade the cooler again.

gallery_1486_103_34271.jpg

gallery_1486_103_108352.jpg

mmm...so was there much cut off the front bar for the 90mm core to fit?

what power levels would a 70mm ARC cooler handel?

im not to concerned about cutting up the reo bar. as that has already been done to fit the N1 vents. but would live to avoid cutting too much off the front bar if possible but will if need be

the ARE guys will make you a custom sized core, thats whats really good about them. (www.are.com.au)

yep - they don't make a 90mm tube/fin as standard fitment.

just give them a buzz and have a chat!

on This Page they have a Type E28 610x300x73 core that will do 400kw conservatively...

Ive got a HKS 100mm one on mine and it fits in behind the reo...i thinks its a matter of how well you can manouvre your piping and cooler to get it sitting in the right spot mostly. Even if you had to make some custom brackets like myself...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...