Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

For sale is my 1995 R33 GTS-T, with loads of extras.

On the clock at the moment is approx 140,000 km's

Rego until October 09

Mods List:

Series 2 engine (km's unknown) with:

- Front Mount Intercooler kit,

- Splitfire Coil Packs,

- Boost controller,

- Blitz blowoff valve,

- Custom Dump pipe,

- Super High-Flow Cat,

- 3" Inch exhaust,

- HKS fcon computer,

- High Flow Turbo

- runs 9psi

- Cushioned Button Clutch

Suspension/Handling/Brakes:

- Tanabe 'circuit' coilovers,

- caster rods,

- HICAS lock bar,

- Tein tie rods,

- tie rod spacers (extra steering lock)

- Front strut brace with master cylinder stopper,

- DS2500 race pads, air ducting and race fluid.

- Custom made braided brake lines by UAS.

Body:

- 400R front bar in primer

- 400R side skirts,

- Explosive rear bar,

- GTR rear wing,

- Dark window tints,

- 4 x 17" Work Equip superlight rims, (one is cracked and needs repairing)

- 4 x 17" TE37s (fitted)

In Car:

- Moulded Gauge Holder above centre console

- housing Boost, Oil Pressure, Oil Temp,

- Kenwood head unit (CD / MP3 / Radio),

- Aftermarket Steering wheel

Car has run a 1:12.4 around Wakefield Park, making it among the fastest R33 GTS-Ts that I've seen or heard of around the track. Car has had extensive weight reduction done and is very fast, I still have most parts to be sold with the car. Extensive stock pile of spare parts to go with the car aswell, including some spare rear coilovers. Fog lights and roll cage will be removed prior to sale and are not included with the car. Sale is due to purchase of new car.

The car is located in Sydney.

598e0426lqhs7.jpg

dsc9584lqge5.jpg

dsc9605lqbz4.jpg

tdsboysnopff9.jpg

The car is very fast and very reliable, in the two years I've owned it mechanically it has only needed a new clutch and Splitfire coil packs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/188876-r33-gts-t-series-15-10499/
Share on other sites

The car isn't engineered, but that's only because I haven't wanted to spend the money on it.

Yes this cage can be engineered easily, it doesn't interfere with anything.

  • 1 month later...

Wow!

Whoever bought this got a bargain!! A well set up car and has had proven results!

A great track car!

And I didnt even get a chance to get out there with it on the track :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...