Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Just finished reading the 'What should I get first?' thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/t45218.html

But what I'm asking is what I should do next, or what would you do next if you were in my position.

Okay, I've got a s2 R33 gtst, so far it has:

apexi fmic

3" exhaust (split dump pipe, 3" cat, 3" cat-back)

hd clutch

spitfire coils

k&n panel filter (tried running a POD, but saw better results with std airbox + panel)

I personally was thinking maybe a PowerFC or even a SAFC2. Or perhaps just a manual boost controller. However, if you think there are mods which will be give me equal or even better gains than these, then I'd prefer it, as my insurance co. (HBF) does not allow any sort of boost controller or replacement/piggyback ECU.

So... If you were me, performance wise what would you do next. Money isn't really an issue. I dont mean that as in I can buy anything. I mean it as in the more expensive the item is, the longer I will wait (and save up) for it.

Thanks heaps :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189893-need-some-advice/
Share on other sites

or get a 10psi wastegate actuator from an r32, and get your standard computer remapped (i think dr drift can do 33's now), that way your insurance company will never know. also i would look into the suspension and brakes

Edited by Green_s13

I would get:

1) A new insurance company

2) New shocks/springs if not already replaced

3) Upgraded brake pads, maybe rotors (just on the fronts).

4) If you did 1), then whatever you like from here :) I'd say ECU/chip. You're in the same spot as me, only I've done 2) and 3) and boy do they make a difference.

Thanks for the replies so far guys.

Without a PowerFC/SAFC, i can't really expect to get more gains KW-wise, is that right?

I was planning to do the brakes/suspension anyway, so at this stage I'm really just interested in what would give me the best gains kw-wise.

yeha you're pretty stuffed if you can't get a powerfc or Tunable ECU unless you want to get a remap. BUt they aren't exactly as easily tunable as a powerfc.

www.justcars.com.au

www.shannonsinsurance.com.au

lol I don't know if they are the right links but you get the idea.

Yeah I think I might settle for an EBC + powerFC. I hear they are hard to come by (PowerFCs) as they are discontinued, i know someone who is selling it without the hand controller. This is still okay right? As I wouldnt change the settings on the controller anyway.

I took the car down to the tuners last week and I was told it was running 1 bar of boost (about 14 psi if im not mistaken) - how is this possible if my car has no electronic or manual boost controller? not sure if it has anything to do with my car running dangerously lean (it has since been fixed).

(Excuse my noobiness as I'm still trying to get my head around all of this)

Also, would you guys recommend putting in an aftermarket turbo in before an ECU. (Basically want to hold off getting an ECU for as long as possible due to insurance complications)

you'll be able to syphon more power out of a After market ECU and stock Turbo than a bigger turbo and stock ECU.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...