Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Forsale is an as new gcg ball bearing hiflow turbo for an r33gtst. This will bolt straight onto standard manifold and includes all lines and a heavyduty xtr actuator. Turbo has seen only approx 4000klms and has no shaft play at all and turbo still looks brand new

looking for $1500 ono

located in the sutherland shire nsw.

pm if interested

Edited by robbo33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190126-as-new-gcg-hiflow-for-r33gtst/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

mitch this turbo is capable of pushing around 260-280kw easily.

Friend had it on his and i have driven it (same turbo as this guy is selling) and man it pulls hard!!

wish i had the money otherwise i would have bought this turbo.. but no job :blush:

yeah sidd ive heard some lucky people pull around 260-280kw

but than some people having like 230kw at 16psi?

need to justify if its worth the money to push around 260-280 like u said cause i would be mega pissed if i brought somthin like this, forked out cash for 550cc injectors z32 and only got like 25rwkw more than what i have now

mitch, it comes down to the tuner.. trust me

Get it tuned same place you got yours tuned at, and it will easily reach 260..

So jealous tho.. wish i could afford a hi-flow..

to much for a highflow mate. u can buy a 3040 or 3675r for that price

Hi newbie, you should learn to keep your opinion to yourself, what he is asking is about average price, comments like that will get you banned.

to much for a highflow mate. u can buy a 3040 or 3675r for that price

yeh mate thats if you want 350rwkw and then you pay for water and oil lines, cooler mods because the turbo is so big and a new manifold.

this is a complete bolt on ballbearing hiflow, good for 250rwkws. it cost $1950 brand new. this is $1400 and you can sell your orignal turbo so really its only about $1100

hey guys im kinda interested. ive heard for the same boost these highflows will make more power than a stock turbo. so if i were to run this turbo at 10psi, would my r34smic be sufficient to cool? what's the highest boost i could run b4 the cooler holds me back?

no not the same turbo. that was a garrett turbo that had been hiflowed by gcg.

this one is a stock r33 gtst turbo hiflowed by gcg. they have different serial and part numbers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...