Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fully understand your point I have seen these power outputs in Adelaide not usre of the life of this though so you might be right with that one as any major increase in power will sure kill the standard turbo in the long run. But this figure is not impossible and MAYBE with multi stage boost controller can achieve this when it is needed then back to a reliable amount of boost to protect the turbo. But then you are looking at more expences.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'll bet your car on it that you will get over 200rwkw :ninja:
bro u said over 200rwkw now ur saying over 250rwkw thats a big difference there mate. make up ur mind 50rwkw is a big difference.

Because I stated that as a comment BRO! And these are all estimates like my other statement "i would imagine around the 250rwkw+ mark"

you won't see over 200rwkw without something done to the turbo and injectors...
Stock turbo and injectors can't make 250rwkw except on a very happy dyno. 190-210rwkw.

Well I am happy to say I am wrong but I would do know that with cam gears major increase is gained with standard turbo etc with exhaust and maybe ecu and even bppst upto 1bar if the budget will allow the firtment of a intercooler then i would imagine over 210rwkw and closer to my result of AROUND 250rwkw.

Well I know that since a Neo motor standard is around!!!!!! 206kw which at the wheels is AROUND 180rwkw GIVE or TAKE as I don’t work for NASA and this is not crucial for the lives of crew members then I think that we all can give a little slack in our gestimations on power out put.

So I have seen Neo Motors get over the 220rwkw mark AND NO before you ask I don’t have proof on me so I would imagine that it is not an impossible feet to reach a output greater then 200kw as some say is almost impossible to reach.

Now without writing a book

I seen allot of tuning in Adelaide and by different people. These tunes may not be safe but can be done. Maybe 250 was a little high but I don’t think it is impossible to get close to it

What's the matter with you boys you jump to argue just like year 7 school boys about who's got bigger pecker ccc...! :laughing-smiley-014:

The new guy just wanted some simple mods advise to get started and still be safe and legal.

All you doing is confusing the bloke and he most likely doesn't understand your jargon.

Dave :)

Just stick to a new intake pod and turbo-back exhaust for now mate.

And if you decide to throw on a boost controller stay at 10psi or lower, stock turbo's are ceramic and very weak.

Before thinking about anything major (turbo/injectors/fuel pump/ECU/front mount/suspension/wheels) make a plan of what you want, make a budget, and find some reputable places to buy parts and mechanics and tuners who will put it all together for you.

For street use i wouldn't go crazy because you'll smash most cars performance-wise with only a few mods to the R34.

Have fun!

a car is a hell of a lot more than brakes, driveline and suspension. well maybe not a hell of a lot but still...dont forget that things break, wear out, need fixing etc. fair enough its a r34 but unless its straight off the showroom floor, you are gonna need to think about these things too (tyres, servicing, etc).

I'm running a R34 GT non turbo, and i have to say the first thing i noticed was the suspension is rather bouncy along with a set of avg yamma tires... Personally i'm gonna work on that area... hopefully stop me from "Auto-drifting" into peoples faces!!!!!!! lol.

- In terms of power they output just under 200KW Base normally i've found; prob not worth bouncing up the power till you can go around a corner without hitting the fences!

* in all honestly, some EDC Red's wouldn't hurt either, i've currently got worn out Nismos on it and being on my L's atm isn't helping.

NEHOOOO!!!! long live NSW.

Cya all at Wiseman's Ferry. - Peace.

HAHA donut dave is right now I am confused is there a simple systematic method of modifying the car? say for example 1st exhaust 2nd air filter 3rd etc. Also thinking abt putting a kit on my car too. Where can I go check out some body kits saw on one of the recent posts with a white 34 loved that body kit..Like reading the posts how you guys were arguing but I didn't understand any of it. Thanks alot guys I am slowing getting to understand the complex world of modifying. Will post a pic of my baby soon.

mate,

the first mods to look at what Id suggest are

intake mods (hi-flow panel filter in airbox) or a pod with a cold air feed and a turbo back exhaust at the same time.

after that?

springs and shocks and a kit somewhere in between

they are small basic mods, but the car will be more alive and you'll love it....for a small amount of time! :)

there are general guidelines but every one does it different. thats what makes the car your own. for exxy, my plan is this (performance only): finish zorst, r34 smic, boost control and guage, safc, fuel stuff etc. some ppl may get the safc first or boost, or something completely different. the best advice i can give you is this - research research research, on sau, other sites, other owners, anywhere. know what a mod does to/for your car b4 you do it. that way you are less likely to do damage, get ripped off and waste cash

good luck man :)

yeh i am slowly researching but there is just too much jargon and it all so confusing lol i dont know where to start haha is there some sort of function where all the members bring out there cars and take for a drive i know some ppl with hondas who take there rides for group cruises would like to go for a cruise like that and have a look at ur guys rides and also have a look at ur mods etc

I read this forum for 3 months solid before I bought my car. It took me another 4 years to get where I am now in terms of knowledge. There is still tons I don't know.

Read, read, read. Ask questions along the way, but ask them like, 'what is this?' rather than 'what is better?'. You figure out what's better yourself. That's the fun of it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...