Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I'm new to the site but i've always loved my Skylines, I bought an XR6 Turbo back in december because i wanted a Turbo car but i needed a 4 door for work (or so i thought).

Don't get me wrong i love my T but i'm strongly considering selling it and buying a 98-2000 R34 GT-T 5 speed.

Is there anything i should be looking out for or problems that may arrise when buying a skyline. For example i bought a 5 speed which is the worst box the XR T's come with but i didn't know at the time. I wanna try and avoid these things if possible this time.

Thanks in advance

Dillon

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191862-thinkin-of-swapping-the-xr6-turbo/
Share on other sites

You can't go wrong with a late model R34 man.

the 5MT is one of the strongest you'll find on a road car.

Id say the only down side will be the stock turbo on the R34.

if you leae the car stock, it's all good.

but to make it lag free, nissan have used all lightweight shit like a type of plastic for the compressor wheel and ceramic for the exhaust wheel.

which is all good and gives the car a lag free driving experience.

how ever, increase the boost to around 12psi and they tend to let go soon enough.

apart from that, at those boost levels, the ECU runs in to rich/retard issues and you need an aftermarket computer or some sort of AFM signal bending piggy back like SAFC.

A hiflow, ecu, injectors and fuel pump and you'll be good for over 220rwkw before the AFM maxes out.

Z32 AFm and you'll be on your way over 250rwkw.

I'm sure the XR6T produces these numbers easily, but the R34 will be about 200kg lighter.

I'm sure you won't regret getting an R34 GTT

Yeah but the xr6 is making those figures at the flywheel, not the treads like you're talking about

The T's about 190rwkw stock. I wanna have the R34 at about 300rwkw enought to still torch most of my xr6 turbo mates. So what your saying is that the 5 speed box wont have any dramas with this power? I will get a heavy duty clutch and mabey flywheel so this will help too.

Edited by XRTPSI
would be good if you could put that engine in the r34, even a 33.

you have a nice car man. i wouldnt change it, but you cant go wrong with a jap car :dry:

Yeah there a great car with so much potential for big power, but the gearbox is giving me the shits and it's about 6k to replace and i've always wanted a R34.

EDIT: Nothing wrong with RB engines, i use to have a VL :ermm:

Edited by XRTPSI
lol probably 10 k to get 300rwk out of a r34 gtt. ecu, turbo, injectors, exhaust, fmic, bigger fuel pump. it never ends man.

dont forget brakes and suspension. you dont wanna end up smacking into something

Sh*t that much. Mabey this ain't such a good idea.

For the T i'd only need valve springs, bigger injectors, fuel pump, custom flash tune, demuf, 2nd cai and mabey a bigger cooler.

Sh*t that much. Mabey this ain't such a good idea.

For the T i'd only need valve springs, bigger injectors, fuel pump, custom flash tune, demuf, 2nd cai and mabey a bigger cooler.

An r34 with gt-rs turbo, injectors, fuel pump, ecu, exhaust, cooler will make around 260rwkW, which is heaps and boost will be available early (about $5000 if you do the labour yourself). Don't forget all the change you'll have left over after selling the xrt :dry: .

Edited by BAMR33

Just wanna throw an element of realism into the mix...

There are a few "laws" i guess you could call them, that come into play the more power you have...

A RWD car with heaps of power is more likely to just spin its wheels unless you have great tires and suspension setup.

Also, to get a lot of power with skylines you generally need a bigger turbo, and the bigger the power target, the bigger the turbo required....and the bigger the turbo, the more lag you have. This only pushes your usable power further up into the rev range and will make the car less responsive and not really the speed machine you're after.

There is a happy medium though, and you can have an extremely responsive and extremely fast skyline that is also reliable and relatively comfortable at the same time.

XR6T's are great cars, all things considered, but being heavy they're not _that_ quick when stock. They do have great potential though, just a pity about the trouble you're having with the manual box. I can say that Nissan gearboxes have a name for reliability and strength. Even the auto boxes will handle 240-260rwkw pretty nicely :w00t:

I'd recommend a R34 with minor mods to begin with, exhaust, safc (or other ecu/piggyback), boost controller. For an extra bit of oomph, a GCG hiflow (or other) turbo, fuel pump, nismo FPR/bigger injectors, upgraded AFM, bigger cooler, brakes (important at this stage), and 16psi or thereabouts and you'll have a very fast skyline.

One thing you'll notice is that the RB25 will rev a lot higher than the XR will and faster as well, not that you need me to tell you. The characteristics of either car are at opposite ends of the scale. The XR6T is a low-revving torque monster with a relatively small turbo for its size, whereas the skyline will rev its guts out and IMO feel more involving and excited...(ie. not saying its more exciting to drive, although it may well be...but the car will feel like it just wants to go...fast)

you'll notice my bias...but this is a skyline forum. I actually drive a stagea, which is about the same weight as your XR6 and with my current mods would probably give it a run for its money too. But being a wagon its not the ideal sports car you're looking for...and I dont intend to make it one :) thats what skylines are for :)

G'day mate,

i'd suggest keeping a close eye on the for sale section. Your bound to have a R34 come up forsale at some time already making 300wkw. Grab that, all the work is done and money has been spent. There are always quite a few high power cars forsale going cheap (for what they are).

There a number of big dollar R32 GTR bargains at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...