Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

does this just have the RB25 turbo or have you put in a whole RB25 engine in to it?

Hey Polishstorm, this car is just running a RB25 turbo..on the Rb20

How different?

considering any trades?

Im after a series4/5 RX7 FC (Preferably in white) wat do u drive GTST? I would consider trades other then the RX7

what about S13 silvia with RB20DET, 25 turbo, RR fuel reg, NPC GTR clutch, alloy radiator, 260rwhp, 5 stud conversion, R32 rims, vented bonnet?

Hey BLV, thanks for the offer, but I must decline as Im looking for something other then a Nissan..like I mentioned in one of the above posts..Im more or less after a FC rx7 as a trade

BUMP!!! Up she go....I still have all interior trims in case people are wondering...I was just doing some wiring work for the water temp gauge as well as the headunit and simply left it off

Bo Bo -

My car is a 91 Liberty RS Turbo ( usual details of these cars can be found here http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0098/article.html )

I can give you full details if you like.

Short version is

Rebuilt with forged pistons and prepped stock rods with ARP rod bolts (receipts for $5K+) by perFOURmance motorsport. (look them up)

97 Twin Turbo heads

fair bit of money in suspension

aftermarket coils, fuel pump.

sti clutch

slotted brakes

etc etc

Has power everything, and cruise control.

it is white and looks exactly like the one in the link above but sits about 1.5inches lower.

Mine is also just re-registered.

stuck the sticker on on the weekend.

Edited by GTST
Bo Bo -

My car is a 91 Liberty RS Turbo ( usual details of these cars can be found here http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0098/article.html )

I can give you full details if you like.

Short version is

Rebuilt with forged pistons and prepped stock rods with ARP rod bolts (receipts for $5K+) by perFOURmance motorsport. (look them up)

97 Twin Turbo heads

fair bit of money in suspension

aftermarket coils, fuel pump.

sti clutch

slotted brakes

etc etc

Has power everything, and cruise control.

it is white and looks exactly like the one in the link above but sits about 1.5inches lower.

Mine is also just re-registered.

stuck the sticker on on the weekend.

Hey GTST...i havent even got my sticker yet...just the plates...haha...

but hey thanks for the offer but i must decline as well as im really after a rotary more then anything atm...sorry...but thanks...

rotary hey?

you must be loaded for all the rebuilds that they require

/typical rotary banter

:thumbsup:

hehe...nah i just want something different..like ur bored with ur liberty...hehe...ive always loved the wankel motor..it intrigues me..as for rebuild...prolly will cost me an arm n a leg...Im tossing up between the FC or the JC cosmo (20b) atm...good luck with ur sale by the way...u can buy mine after u sell urs...haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...