Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah sure have, works well. but count the bushes down there, there are 16 from memory once you count upper and lower, inner and outer. I think they are all the same. Be careful with the noltec website though, their catalogue was not right when i got them a few years back

i did mine not long ago... was a full on prick of a job to get the old bushes out, ended up using an oxy torch and a vice. Better off taking the arms out yourself then paying someone to remove the old bushes as its just not worth the headache. The new bushes go in easy enough

Removal is a bit of a saga without a press. I drilled through the rubberwith an 1/8inch drill or there abouts and pressed the crush tube out with a vice, then hacksawed a couple of slots in the outer about 2mm apart and used a pin punch to roll that out. It took about 10-15 minutes per bush once i got the hang of it. The trick is to go slow with the hacksaw so you don't cut right through into the arm itself, then using the punch you tear the strip out and leave the arm undamaged.

I found that the lower control arm inner bush numbers in the catalogue to be wrong. There are 2 possible sizes. You need to measure yours before ordering and make sure it gets passed on to noltec. I got the same wrong bushes sent out twice before finally getting the right ones (they were numbered as z32 ones on the packaging).

Installation is a piece of cake. no press required.

i took the factory bushes apart today ,it seems that the only thing that wears and causes the unwanted movement,is the plastic inserts that sit inside between the metal bush and the crush tube,so why cant we just buy these?

post-13324-1195200687_thumb.jpg

post-13324-1195200709_thumb.jpg

dude!

Your picture up top is the rear bushes. You are ripping out the fronts which is a completely different process! And different size bushes too.

There's a collar that you just smack with a hammer and a chisel (or screwdriver) It takes the whole bush out as a unit. They are the easiest bush to remove of all the suspension bushes. You can see the collar in your photo above my last post.

you know its been ages since I've seen the stock ones, but I thought they were 1 piece rubber with a metal crush tube in the center. Looks like yours have been changed at some stage unless I am mad

*disclaimer* I may well be mad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...