Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

160kw / 2litres = 80kw Per Litre.

187kw / 2.5litres = 74.8kw Per Litre.

208kw / 2.6litres = 80kw Per Litre.

Why is it that the ol' RB20DET makes more power per litre?

I always thought that the RB20DET had a lesser flowing head etc.

Any one have a logical explaniation?

This probably isn't true in practise but..

If you were to up the capacity and the turbo was able to flow the amount of air with no problems then....

3ltr bottom end with RB20DET head = ~240kw

3ltr bottom end with RB25DET head = ~224kw

3ltr bottom end with RB26DETT head = ~240kw.

Obviously the RB20DET head won't make more power than the RB26DETT head on the same bottom end but why is this?!?!?!

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Power depends on airflow through the engine only, engine capacity is irrelevant.

So if you take a given induction system, cylinder head, and exhaust system, it virtually fixes the maximum airflow capacity and hence the power.

If you then place a larger bore and stroked block under the same head it will still be limited to the same maximum airflow. So an RB30DE will make no more power than an RB25DE if everything else remains exactly the same. Think about it.

It will however produce a lot more torque, and the same power at a lower RPM. It will be more grunty and less revy. This might be an advantage, and it might not.

So increasing engine capacity by 20% (30/25) is going to increase acceleration and reduce top speed. You can do the exact same thing by lowering the diff ratio by 20% a lot more easily.

Just to make it even more interesting, your RB30 with tall diff, will have the same piston speed as an RB25 with the shorter diff at the same road-speed in any gear. They will probably also have very similar fuel economy, acceleration, and top speed capability.

Interesting eh !

I agree with SteveL. The RB25 isn't being pushed as hard as the RB20 - not that the 20 is on a knife edge or anything, it's just working harder.

I suppose they couldn't make the RB25 too close to the 26 in terms of power; if it had the same kW/L output it'd be a 200kW motor, probably too similar to the GTR engine. Probably the same reason you couldn't get an R33 GTS4 with the RB25DET in it.

Of course this argument doesn't apply to the 34's Neo, which makes a claimed 206kW iirc, so I dunno :)

Warpspeed.

You mentioned DE motors not DET's....

So.. its sounds correct that on Forced Induction motors, increase the capacity and the peak power will also increase.

From dyno runs I've seen all the RB30DET's still make their peak power at around the mid 6000 rpm.

A RB30DE motor was built and featured in a ZOOM magazine quite some time ago. It was running a low compression ratio of around 8.3:1 and made a final power output of around 110rwkw. This is 160kw at the flywheel territority.

If the Compression ratio was the same as that of the RB25DE it would have surely made another 15kw or so.

In theory what you said sounds correct but for some reason in practise it doesn't work out. Could this be possibly due to the fact that the head isn't actually a restriction when even on a 3000cc bottom end??!?!

hope that made sense i've just finished a night shift... :)

H Joel.

I deliberately stayed with n/a motors for the illustration because it is easier to understand. The same holds true with turbo motors as well, BHP per pound of boost will stay the same.

It not just sounds true in theory it is true ! But no one does it.

When they fit the RB30 bottom end they also change a lot of other things at the same time, I certainly would.

Sydneykid is the RB30 turbo king, and It certainly makes a very potent package. The main thing the RB30 bottom end gives you is a lot more off boost torque, and better response from that big bad turbo. All things considered an RB30DET is a very good street package.

But it is also true that there is nothing wrong with an RB26DETT modified to the same level. It all just happens further up the RPM range. Personally I would rather have the RB26 and some shorter rear end gears, but others will disagree.

Warpspeed, does this mean that if you take a RB25, shorten the diff by 20% and you would have a similar package to a RB30 with the original diff? Or does this only apply to NA engines? To regain the the top end would it be as straight forward as increasing the revs by 20%?

Cheers

Steve

It probably would decrease economy and increase wear, but I dont think it would be overly dramatic, because there is less load on the engine.

Enrico, you would have to get a new diff center. I was thinking of going to a auto center, only 4.3 vs 4.1 in the manual, I believe the R32 manual uses a 4.3 diff too? but it might be worth going a bit higher still and get a decent aftermarket one - think I'll be doing a bit more research:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought I'd do a write up on an auto transmission fluid change for a the nissan 7 speed Automatic. At some stage the genius engineers decided that the fluid in the trans was "for the life of the transmission", (which seems kind of self supporting to me) and removed the dip stick and fill tube (funnily enough there is still a casting for it). Anyway, for this job you do need 2 specialist tools in addition to regular hand tools, jack and good chassis stands. You need a way to pump fluid up to the transmission; I got one of these but there are plenty of other options: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/364584087070 Don't trust the generic listing though, it does not come with the required adapter for the Nissan 7 Speed. You need one of these, can't do the job without it: https://navarapart.com.au/product/genuine-nissan-patrol-y62-d23-np300-navara-re7-dipstick-fill-connector1 You need a heap of compatible transmission oil. Could be Nissan, could be anything else rated for Nissan Matic S. You need at least 10 litres, I had 15 to give it a better flush... Also, you need some biiig oil catch trays, at least one of these, or bigger if possible (volume was fine, size was very marginal): https://autobarn.com.au/ab/Autobarn-Category/Tools-%26-Garage/Specialty-Tools/Oil-Service/Garage-Tough-Oil-Drain-Pan-Black-16L---GT1068/p/TO03191 Finally, a measuring jug is very useful if your pump does not have volumes marked on it, I got a 6l one: https://www.repco.com.au/oils-fluids/fluid-accessories/measuring-jugs/penrite-measuring-jug-6l-pmj006/p/A5322648 Oh, and gloves.....this stuff is horrible (not as bad as diff oil, but getting there) ....First, jack up your car.....
    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
×
×
  • Create New...