Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

I have R32 GTR calipers using the stock 32mm rotor. Im investigating using a set of adapters to space these out to accept the larger R33/34 bremo sized rotor which is only 30mm thick whilst still using the R32GTR calipers.

Assuming a few people have done this, is it safe ? im a little hesitant considering the rotor brand new is at the minimum "allowed" thickness and when worn will get down to 2mm overall below minimum recomended thickness.

I'm assuming a few people on here have done this, or know wether its 200% safe even when the rotor and pad are nearly fully worn (not that i will let them get that far but i still want to know that its safe even to this level)

Thanks

Edited by BlitzSSS
there is no problem doing it. the 30mm minimum thickness is for that specific rotor. the 33 brembo rotors have a minimum thickness of 28mm.

I'm not worried about the rotors being unsafe, it's the calipers that have been designed to be used on a minimum thickness of 30mm, even though 28mm is only 1mm less per side im still concerned that the pistons won't go past their maximum allowed point and potentially pop out past the seals.

I don't see the point in using a larger diameter disc if the caliper/pad size is the same. Especially since you will be loosing 2mm thickness, I would be sticking with the thicker rotors you have now.

It's still going to provide more braking power, and there is a heck of alot more "metal" in the larger sized rotor than one with an extra 2mm thickness so heat absorption and dissipation will be much greater also. I'd love to buy a set of Brembo calipers but they sell for way to much.

Can anyone else using this combo please advise ? :verymad:

like I said there is no problem doing it. with calipers, rotors, pistons, seals, pads anything. if you are really concerned about it put some 1mm thick shims behind your pads (which is a good idea anyway).

as for larger rotor not being worthwhile. it's very worthwhile. the caliper now has more leverage as it's operating further out from the centre. also larger rotor means larger capacity to dissipate heat across it's surface. all good things.

I have fitted R32 / R33 GTSt calipers to Commodores as a conversion and use 28mm discs and never had a problem.

The pistons have to come out a long way before they go past the seal.

the minimum thickness of a disc is more to do with the disc rotor strength (being too thin) rather than worrying about being too thin for your caliper.

Ive seen Landcruiser brakes worn so much they have worn past the flat disc surface and into the ventilated fins by about 7mm and the piston is still working ok!

Really, it is no different running R32 GTR brakes without and shims behind the pads (1mm each side?) like so many do.

Edited by VHR32
I don't see the point in using a larger diameter disc if the caliper/pad size is the same. Especially since you will be loosing 2mm thickness, I would be sticking with the thicker rotors you have now.

at least 3 good reasons

1. increased leverage ratio (higher torque capacity on a larger diameter rotor)

2. increased rotor mass (better heat capacity = less fade)

3. reduced pad and brake fluid temperatures

have a read of some brake threads on here, there is a lot of good info.

think about it this way - why does a brake upgrade kit try and squeeze the biggest rotor it can onto a car?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
    • I have an elite 2500 running an adapter harness on an rb25de neo r34. I took the butterfly out and removed all that junk. But I also went Plus+t at the same time. The butterfly thing works in reverse to the boost solenoid on the Gtt if that makes sense
    • yeh they are 235/45/17 up front and 255/40/17 in the rears. I still didn't get my answer if i can fit a 18x9 up front. I want to get 4 of this and see if they will fit before committing as they didn't see an 18x8 as an option but there is a 18x9.5 also.   Enkei RS05-RR 18x9 35mm ET 5x114.3 75.0 Bore Matte Gunmetal Wheel
×
×
  • Create New...