Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

did u buy this from some guy down south back in may? he wanted low to mid 20's now 6 months later you want 32k? how does that make sence only thing that seems to be changed is the turbo set up?

mate ur obviously trying to cause trouble or something... if u only knew the way it was wen i bought it... and now how much money ive spent on it... i ve spent over well over 10k in the time of me owning it, every single aspect of the motor has been replaced with high quality high performance products coz when i bought it everything was standard except the 'gcg' brand 35/40 turbo!!! on top of that the car interior was not finished to the slightest, the old owner will tell u himself!

Thanks alot for saying that crap in my thread and without being descent enough to pm me to find out the info

Edited by kardieb
mate ur obviously trying to cause trouble or something... if u only knew the way it was wen i bought it... and now how much money ive spent on it... i ve spent over well over 10k in the time of me owning it, every single aspect of the motor has been replaced with high quality high performance products coz when i bought it everything was standard except the 'gcg' brand 35/40 turbo!!! on top of that the car interior was not finished to the slightest, the old owner will tell u himself!

Thanks alot for saying that crap in my thread and without being descent enough to pm me to find out the info

I wasnt talking sh*t I was just stating an obvious fact that im sure someone else would have asked if I didnt, now that you have told us what has been done since you have owned it im sure now people can justify why you are asking so much, wasnt trying to wreck your thred dude. GL

oh mate had dramas i had to get my inlet plenum modified coz the 180 bay is so small, i had to delay this tune il get it done wen the new intake side is back on

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...